Note that OpenDAL is currently releasing simulately, while each component can have different version.
To release multilingual SDK and the main server, you should determine: 1. Version strategy (tag strategy) 2. How to manually/automatically deploy to the target repository (crates.io, Maven, PyPI, NPM etc.) 3. The release process to fit in ASF requirements [1][2] [1] https://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html [2] https://opendal.apache.org/community/release/ Best, tison. Xuanwo <[email protected]> 于2025年2月8日周六 11:16写道： > > Welcome to check opendal's CI: > https://github.com/apache/opendal/tree/main/.github/workflows > > On Sat, Feb 8, 2025, at 11:15, Kranti Parisa wrote: > > Agreed, there are pros and cons. But I like Xuanwo's thoughts around > > growing the project much smoother way. > > > > Our biggest concern was around CI/CD, so if we could spend some time > > upfront to setup things, it should be on autopilot mode after. > > > > Are there any examples of such mono repos with different CI/CD > > pipelines to release SDKs and main server independently? > > > > On 2025/02/07 06:50:53 tison wrote: > >> The downside of mono repo is that CI/CD, especially releases, would be > >> much more complicated. It's possible but you need some time to work on > >> tools and settings. > >> > >> Best, > >> tison. > >> > >> tison <[email protected]> 于2025年2月7日周五 14:49写道： > >> > > >> > EDIT: [1] > >> > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml/blob/main/README.md > >> > > >> > Best, > >> > tison. > >> > > >> > tison <[email protected]> 于2025年2月7日周五 14:48写道： > >> > > > >> > > > First of all, after migrating the repositories to the ASF, we will > >> > > > lose admin permissions for them. This means that any operations > >> > > > requiring admin privileges will have to go through INFRA tickets > >> > > > unless they are supported by ASF tools. > >> > > > >> > > To clarify, the INFRA team is working on making the experience more > >> > > smooth, check [1][2]. > >> > > > >> > > [1] > >> > > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml/blob/ng-parser/docs/ASFYamlFeature.md > >> > > [2] > >> > > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-asfyaml/blob/ng-parser/docs/ASFYamlFeature.md > >> > > > >> > > But .. yes, it's not GitHub-Native. > >> > > > >> > > Best, > >> > > tison. > >> > > > >> > > Xuanwo <[email protected]> 于2025年2月7日周五 14:45写道： > >> > > > > >> > > > I'd like to share some reasons why I prefer using a monorepo for > >> > > > OpenDAL. > >> > > > > >> > > > First of all, after migrating the repositories to the ASF, we will > >> > > > lose admin permissions for them. This means that any operations > >> > > > requiring admin privileges will have to go through INFRA tickets > >> > > > unless they are supported by ASF tools. For example, configuring > >> > > > GitHub secrets or making CI run for every PR by default. Setting > >> > > > this up for multiple repositories could be very challenging. > >> > > > > >> > > > Secondly, I find that keeping everything in the same monorepo makes > >> > > > it easier for the project to grow. Stars, issues, PRs, and > >> > > > discussions all happen in the same repository, making it easier to > >> > > > bring people together. This is especially important for a small and > >> > > > new project. We can always split the project later once we have a > >> > > > sufficient number of dedicated committers focusing on a specific > >> > > > area—for example, three committers who explicitly dedicate > >> > > > themselves to the Go SDK. > >> > > > > >> > > > Both setups work for me. > >> > > > > >> > > > On Fri, Feb 7, 2025, at 14:28, tison wrote: > >> > > > > cc in case you don't subscribe dev@ yet. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > You can reply with PonyMail also [1] > >> > > > > > >> > > > > [1] > >> > > > > https://lists.apache.org/thread/zrn96nlg23r9353lr5tp2by2ggx4zxqc > >> > > > > > >> > > > > Best, > >> > > > > tison. > >> > > > > > >> > > > > tison <[email protected]> 于2025年2月7日周五 11:30写道： > >> > > > > > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> Hi, > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> I'd continue the discussion from [1] about whether we'd set up a > >> > > > >> monorepo for all the Iggy's code, or continue the current multiple > >> > > > >> repositories solution. > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> [1] > >> > > > >> https://lists.apache.org/thread/ppqjvygk8xs7v8no5dk6r6khm5m1vp71 > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> The only thing I'd point out is that the ASF doesn't support > >> > > > >> fine-grained permissions so please make correct assumption. > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> Either monorepo (OpenDAL's multilingual bindings [2]) or multiple > >> > > > >> repos (SkyWalking and its multilingual SDK [3]) works for me. > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> [2] https://github.com/apache/opendal > >> > > > >> [3] > >> > > > >> https://github.com/apache?q=skywalking&type=all&language=&sort= > >> > > > >> > >> > > > >> Best, > >> > > > >> tison. > >> > > > > >> > > > -- > >> > > > Xuanwo > >> > > > > >> > > > https://xuanwo.io/ > >> > > -- > Xuanwo > > https://xuanwo.io/
