Great, we can move fwd with single repo then. @Xuanwo once we have the repo in place, we would highly appreciate your help in setting up the CI/CD pipelines like you did for OpenDAL.
I've opened the Jira ticket for moving git repo. Best, Kranti On Sat, Feb 8, 2025 at 12:30 PM Hubert Gruszecki <hgrusze...@apache.org> wrote: > Also +1 for monorepo from my side. We could nicely integrate tests for all > SDKs in other languages so they are never out of sync compared to Rust SDK, > which is was always a first class citizen. > > On 2025/02/08 08:00:10 Grzegorz Koszyk wrote: > > +1 for the monorepo from me, we will in the future for sure move towards > bindings for our sdks (not sure if entirely or partially), having it in a > single repository makes the migrating/maintaining process much easier. > > > > On 2025/02/07 03:30:01 tison wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I'd continue the discussion from [1] about whether we'd set up a > > > monorepo for all the Iggy's code, or continue the current multiple > > > repositories solution. > > > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ppqjvygk8xs7v8no5dk6r6khm5m1vp71 > > > > > > The only thing I'd point out is that the ASF doesn't support > > > fine-grained permissions so please make correct assumption. > > > > > > Either monorepo (OpenDAL's multilingual bindings [2]) or multiple > > > repos (SkyWalking and its multilingual SDK [3]) works for me. > > > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/opendal > > > [3] https://github.com/apache?q=skywalking&type=all&language=&sort= > > > > > > Best, > > > tison. > > > > > >
