Also +1 for monorepo from my side. We could nicely integrate tests for all SDKs in other languages so they are never out of sync compared to Rust SDK, which is was always a first class citizen.
On 2025/02/08 08:00:10 Grzegorz Koszyk wrote: > +1 for the monorepo from me, we will in the future for sure move towards > bindings for our sdks (not sure if entirely or partially), having it in a > single repository makes the migrating/maintaining process much easier. > > On 2025/02/07 03:30:01 tison wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'd continue the discussion from [1] about whether we'd set up a > > monorepo for all the Iggy's code, or continue the current multiple > > repositories solution. > > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/ppqjvygk8xs7v8no5dk6r6khm5m1vp71 > > > > The only thing I'd point out is that the ASF doesn't support > > fine-grained permissions so please make correct assumption. > > > > Either monorepo (OpenDAL's multilingual bindings [2]) or multiple > > repos (SkyWalking and its multilingual SDK [3]) works for me. > > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/opendal > > [3] https://github.com/apache?q=skywalking&type=all&language=&sort= > > > > Best, > > tison. > > >
