I am OK with either FSYNC or STRICT variant. LOG_ONLY name means "log without fsync".
On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 7:02 AM, Ivan Rakov <ivan.glu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Why create a new term to define something that has already been defined? > >> > > That makes sense. I'm ok with FSYNC. > > Anton, I don't understand why we should rename LOG_ONLY to SYNC. We > > started this discussion with bad naming of DEFAULT, but this has nothing > to > > do with LOG_ONLY (even though it may be scientific - but SYNC sounds > > scientific as well). > > > > I agree with Ivan, we should not go wild with renaming. However, I would > like to find out what is the meaning behind the LOG_ONLY name. Can someone > explain? > > D. > -- Best regards, Ilya
