Igniters, just to clarify, does the term LOG_ONLY mean anything in the industry or is this just an Ignite term?
D. On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Anton Vinogradov <avinogra...@gridgain.com> wrote: > Log only mode: flushes application buffers. > So, in synced mode without fsync guarantee. That's why I propose to rename > it as SYNC. > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 4:49 PM, Ilya Lantukh <ilant...@gridgain.com> > wrote: > > > I am OK with either FSYNC or STRICT variant. > > > > LOG_ONLY name means "log without fsync". > > > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 4:05 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > dsetrak...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Feb 16, 2018 at 7:02 AM, Ivan Rakov <ivan.glu...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > Why create a new term to define something that has already been > > defined? > > > >> > > > > That makes sense. I'm ok with FSYNC. > > > > Anton, I don't understand why we should rename LOG_ONLY to SYNC. We > > > > started this discussion with bad naming of DEFAULT, but this has > > nothing > > > to > > > > do with LOG_ONLY (even though it may be scientific - but SYNC sounds > > > > scientific as well). > > > > > > > > > > I agree with Ivan, we should not go wild with renaming. However, I > would > > > like to find out what is the meaning behind the LOG_ONLY name. Can > > someone > > > explain? > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Ilya > > >
