OK, so what is the plan? How do we get rid of the fabric name? D.
On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 2:21 AM, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org> wrote: > Since you proposing patch to the community, you are the very man :) > > ср, 1 авг. 2018 г. в 12:16, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com>: > > > You are convincing the wrong person. > > > > > > > > > On 1 Aug 2018, at 12:05, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org> wrote: > > > > > > Peter, > > > > > > We had a discussion about how to do this properly. > > > Proposed solution cannot be merged, since it makes code harder than it > > was. > > > > > > The only case is to perform complete refactoring and get rid of all > > > postfixes and other weird stuff. > > > > > > For example > > > - <ignite.zip.pattern> > > > - <ignite.edition> > > > should be definetely removed from code. > > > > > > > > > ср, 1 авг. 2018 г. в 9:39, Peter Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com>: > > > > > >> The task was ready long ago, but community failed to review and merge > it > > >> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ > > >> Not being a committer, my capabilities of introducing such changes are > > >> limited. > > >> > > >> I will update code during this week and will pass for review once > again. > > >> > > >> > > >> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 at 00:24, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org > > > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Yes, agree, fabric has to be removed. If it is done in 2.7, would be > > >> great! > > >>> > > >>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Peter, folks, > > >>>> > > >>>> It's weird, but we have been failing to introduce this minor change > > >> since > > >>>> December. Can we get it done for 2.7 that is being discussed at the > > >>> moment? > > >>>> Are there any technical issues that block you from merging the > > changes? > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Denis > > >>>> > > >>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:03 PM Peter Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Ok, then I will update issue code and start preparation for build > > >>>>> configuration changes. > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 at 23:41, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> > wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> With which one — current implementation in issue? > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> That's the answer to your question: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> 1. quickly fix all of them (can be solved by preliminary > > >>> preparations — > > >>>>>> searching for -fabric- usages in build configuration); > > >>>>>> 2. update all branches to master because otherwise old branch > > >>> will > > >>>>> stop > > >>>>>> building. > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> -- > > >>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On 7 Jun 2018, at 23:04, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> > > >> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> I'm fine with the suggested approach. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> With which one — current implementation in issue? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> However, not sure we need to update > > >>>>>>>> all the branches. Can't branch owners just pull the changes > > >> back > > >>>> from > > >>>>>>>> master if the plan to merge back later? > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> Of course, we as an initiative group of this issue should do > > >>> nothing, > > >>>>> it > > >>>>>>> will lie on shoulders of developers. > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Petr Ivanov < > > >>> mr.wei...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> Denis, > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> The most simple approach — repack and rearchive binary archive > > >>>> after > > >>>>>>>>> release build, however that would not resolve the problem > > >>> globally > > >>>>>> (and > > >>>>>>>>> will require fixing every build configuration we have on > > >>>> TeamCity). > > >>>>>>>>> Current approach implemented in task — creates already correct > > >>>>> folder > > >>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>> binary archive name, but old name (with -fabric-) is used in > > >>>> almost > > >>>>>>> every > > >>>>>>>>> build configuration too and merge code to master will require > > >>> to: > > >>>>>>>>> 1. quickly fix all of them (can be solved by preliminary > > >>>>>> preparations > > >>>>>>>>> — searching for -fabric- usages in build configuration); > > >>>>>>>>> 2. update all branches to master because otherwise old > > >> branch > > >>>>> will > > >>>>>>>>> stop building. > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> WDYT? > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On 7 Jun 2018, at 22:42, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> > > >>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Petr, > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for pulling up the conversation. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> I still prefer us not to complicate the things and just > > >> remove > > >>>>>> "fabric" > > >>>>>>>>>> from the *package name*. Use the easiest way possible. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> Personally, I don't care about Hadoop and would not suggest > > >> the > > >>>>>>> community > > >>>>>>>>>> wasting its time on it. So, just rename the suffixes/prefixes > > >>> of > > >>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>> build > > >>>>>>>>>> files the way you like to address Anton's concerns. > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Petr Ivanov < > > >>> mr.wei...@gmail.com > > >>>>> > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Lets define once again what should be done in this [1] task? > > >>>>>>>>>>> If current implementation is good, than I’ll update it to > > >>> master > > >>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>> pass > > >>>>>>>>>>> for review. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> Yet, there is other part of the task which concerns our > > >> build > > >>>>> server > > >>>>>>> — I > > >>>>>>>>>>> assume that almost all our build configurations will fail > > >> due > > >>> to > > >>>>>> name > > >>>>>>>>>>> change and there is no simple way of updating configurations > > >>>> other > > >>>>>>> then > > >>>>>>>>>>> merge task to master and start fixing failing builds. > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251 > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 Feb 2018, at 01:56, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think we necessarily need to remove 'fabric' word > > >>> from > > >>>>>> every > > >>>>>>>>>>> file > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> in the project, we just need to rename the name of > > >>>> downloadable > > >>>>>>>>> package. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Couldn’t say it better than you, Val. Thanks for pitching > > >> in > > >>> :) > > >>>>>> This > > >>>>>>> is > > >>>>>>>>>>> exactly what the ticket is about. > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> — > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 9, 2018, at 11:53 AM, Valentin Kulichenko < > > >>>>>>>>>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Anton, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think we necessarily need to remove 'fabric' word > > >>> from > > >>>>>> every > > >>>>>>>>>>> file > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> in the project, we just need to rename the name of > > >>>> downloadable > > >>>>>>>>>>> package. Is > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> there any other place where 'fabric' is exposed to the > > >> user? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> If that's the case, it should not be a big change, no? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -Val > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Anton Vinogradov < > > >>>>>>>>>>> avinogra...@gridgain.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're proposing changes without viewing a code :) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:07 PM, Denis Magda < > > >>>>> dma...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anton, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What’s wrong if we just go ahead and: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - replace “fabric” with “ignite” > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - replace “hadoop” with “ignite-hadoop" > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 8, 2018, at 1:51 AM, Anton Vinogradov < > > >>>>>>>>>>> avinogra...@gridgain.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "hadoop" and "fabric" words work on same engine. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have special assembly desctiptors, for example: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies-fabric.xml > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies-fabric-lgpl.xml > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies-hadoop.xml > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-base.xml > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-fabric.xml > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-fabric-base.xml > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-fabric-lgpl.xml > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-hadoop.xml > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I'ts impossible for now to remove "fabric" without > > >>>>> "hadoop" > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> removal. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only one case is to make some ditry hack, but that's > > >> not > > >>> a > > >>>>> good > > >>>>>>>>> idea. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Sergey Kozlov < > > >>>>>>>>> skoz...@gridgain.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 hadoop accelerator removing for AI 2.5 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also probably IGFS should be either removed or > > >>> refactored, > > >>>>>> e.g. > > >>>>>>>>>>> create > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FS > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directly over the data region without using "cache" > > >>> entity > > >>>>> as > > >>>>>> an > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intermidiate stage > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:13 AM, Denis Magda < > > >>>>>> dma...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anton, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don’t get how the hadoop editions are related to > > >> this > > >>>>> task. > > >>>>>>> The > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not named as “data fabric” for a while. Check up > > >> the > > >>>>> site > > >>>>>> or > > >>>>>>>>>>> docs. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The “fabric” word is being removed from all over the > > >>>> places > > >>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>> needs > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be removed from the editions’ names. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for the hadoop future, my personal position is to > > >>>> retire > > >>>>>>> this > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> component > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and forget about it. I would restart the conversation > > >>>> again > > >>>>>>> after > > >>>>>>>>>>> we > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 2.4. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 7, 2018, at 2:13 AM, Anton Vinogradov < > > >>>>> a...@apache.org > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, Petr, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I checked PR and found we have *overcomplicated* > > >> logic > > >>>>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>> "fabric" > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "hadoop" postfixs. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we really need to assembly 2 editions? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hadoop" edition still valued? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My proposal is to get rid of "hadoop" edition and > > >>>> replace > > >>>>> it > > >>>>>>>>> with > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction of how to use "fabric" edition instead. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instruction will be pretty easy -> move "hadoop" > > >>> folder > > >>>>> from > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "optional" > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> root directory :) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we can just remove all postfix logic > > >> from > > >>>>> maven > > >>>>>>>>> poms > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simplify release process. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Denis Magda < > > >>>>>>> dma...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Petr, thanks for solving it! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope that Anton V. or some other build master will > > >>>>>>> double-check > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes and merge them. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 28, 2017, at 8:29 AM, Petr Ivanov < > > >>>>>>> mr.wei...@gmail.com > > >>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7251 is done, needs review and some > > >>> additional > > >>>>>> tests. > > >>>>>>>>> See > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> PR > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3315 [1]. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3315 < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3315> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Dec 2017, at 23:15, Denis Magda < > > >>>>> dma...@apache.org > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Petr, thanks, such a swift turnaround! > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you found the one who can asses and review > > >> the > > >>>>>>> changes? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maintainers label might be helpful. Just ping > > >> them > > >>>>>>> directly: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+ > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>> to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-ReviewProcessandMaintainers < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/ > > >>>> confluence/display/IGNITE/How+ > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>> to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-ReviewProcessandMaintainers> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 20, 2017, at 12:24 AM, Petr Ivanov < > > >>>>>>>>>>> mr.wei...@gmail.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assigned myself — done the same work while > > >>> preparing > > >>>>> RPM > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> package. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But for fixing DEVNOTES.txt waiting for review > > >> and > > >>>>> merge > > >>>>>>> of > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7107 [1]. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/ > > >>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-7107 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19 Dec 2017, at 22:55, Denis Magda < > > >>>>>> dma...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the bids were accepted and the verdict is > > >>>>> executed: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251 > > >>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is ready to pick this up? > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2017, at 5:35 AM, Anton Vinogradov > > >> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avinogra...@gridgain.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1б фо шур > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Vladimir > > >>> Ozerov < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voze...@gridgain.com> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1б вуаштшеудн > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:34 AM, Valentin > > >>>>> Kulichenko > > >>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:24 PM, Dmitriy > > >>>>> Setrakyan > > >>>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dsetrak...@apache.org > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (completely agree) > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Denis > > >>> Magda < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dma...@apache.org> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Ignite binary releases still > > >> include > > >>>>>> “fabric” > > >>>>>>>>>>> word > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> names: > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ignite.apache.org/ > > >>>> download.cgi#binaries > > >>>>> < > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ignite.apache.org/ > > >>>> download.cgi#binaries > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For instance, this is a full name of the > > >>>>> previous > > >>>>>>>>>>> release > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> - > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache-ignite-fabric-2.3.0-bin. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It’s a little oversight on our side > > >> because > > >>>> the > > >>>>>>>>> project > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> has > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> positioned as a fabric for a while. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposal! Remove “fabric” from the name > > >> and > > >>>> have > > >>>>>> the > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> named > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as - apache-ignite-{version}-bin. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we’re in consensus then let’s make the > > >>>> change > > >>>>>> in > > >>>>>>>>> 2.4. > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >>> > > >> > > > > >
