Folks, Can you please explain the problem with TC and artifacts? Can we just rename final artifact at the end of a build phase just before signing, and leave the rest TC infrastructure as is?
On Fri, Aug 3, 2018 at 12:28 AM Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> wrote: > Anton, Petr, > > Thanks for your readiness to assist. Can this be done for 2.7 release? > > D. > > On Thu, Aug 2, 2018 at 1:32 AM, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org> wrote: > > > What I see is that we spent almost a year discussing how to do this. > > I'm pretty sure we had enough time to do everything properly. > > > > So, proposal is to stop this discussion and start refactoring. > > > > I do not see any pitfalls and ready to assist if necessary. > > > > чт, 2 авг. 2018 г. в 5:14, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org>: > > > > > I vote to remove the fabric from the build in the easiest way possible. > > Can > > > other Igniters comment? > > > > > > D. > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:46 PM, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > My concern here is exactly about internal build processes — removing > > > > fabric from the name of binary archive (with any way) will break lots > > of > > > > them. > > > > There will be no sacrifices, just lots of work for fixing build > > processes > > > > (where we won’t be able to introduce changes proactively). > > > > > > > > Therefore only fabric removal implementation (quick with some legacy > > left > > > > or full refactoring) is on the agenda. > > > > And this matter should be jugged by the community: currently we have > > (if > > > > our voices are equal) 1:1 with Anton about it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 1 Aug 2018, at 22:28, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrak...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Let's focus on what is important here. Our users do not care about > > our > > > > > internal build process.If we could remove the word fabric from the > > next > > > > > release without any significant sacrifices in the build process or > > > making > > > > > it less maintainable, I suggest we do it. > > > > > > > > > > D. > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 12:24 PM, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com> > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > >> Simple way with some hack and legacy maintenance: accept patch as > it > > > is > > > > >> implemented now. > > > > >> Hard way: full assembly refactoring and hadoop rejection. > > > > >> > > > > >> Anyway, after this is merged to master — complete automation > systems > > > > >> revision (TeamCity for example) is required due to heavy hardcode > of > > > > >> “fabric” in such systems. > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>> On 1 Aug 2018, at 21:55, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > dsetrak...@apache.org> > > > > >> wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>> OK, so what is the plan? How do we get rid of the fabric name? > > > > >>> > > > > >>> D. > > > > >>> > > > > >>> On Wed, Aug 1, 2018 at 2:21 AM, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > >>> > > > > >>>> Since you proposing patch to the community, you are the very man > > :) > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>> ср, 1 авг. 2018 г. в 12:16, Petr Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com>: > > > > >>>> > > > > >>>>> You are convincing the wrong person. > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>> On 1 Aug 2018, at 12:05, Anton Vinogradov <a...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> Peter, > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> We had a discussion about how to do this properly. > > > > >>>>>> Proposed solution cannot be merged, since it makes code harder > > > than > > > > it > > > > >>>>> was. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> The only case is to perform complete refactoring and get rid > of > > > all > > > > >>>>>> postfixes and other weird stuff. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> For example > > > > >>>>>> - <ignite.zip.pattern> > > > > >>>>>> - <ignite.edition> > > > > >>>>>> should be definetely removed from code. > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>> ср, 1 авг. 2018 г. в 9:39, Peter Ivanov <mr.wei...@gmail.com > >: > > > > >>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> The task was ready long ago, but community failed to review > and > > > > merge > > > > >>>> it > > > > >>>>>>> ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ > > > > >>>>>>> Not being a committer, my capabilities of introducing such > > > changes > > > > >> are > > > > >>>>>>> limited. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> I will update code during this week and will pass for review > > once > > > > >>>> again. > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> On Wed, 1 Aug 2018 at 00:24, Dmitriy Setrakyan < > > > > >> dsetrak...@apache.org > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> Yes, agree, fabric has to be removed. If it is done in 2.7, > > > would > > > > be > > > > >>>>>>> great! > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 2:18 PM, Denis Magda < > > dma...@apache.org > > > > > > > > >>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> Peter, folks, > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> It's weird, but we have been failing to introduce this > minor > > > > change > > > > >>>>>>> since > > > > >>>>>>>>> December. Can we get it done for 2.7 that is being > discussed > > at > > > > the > > > > >>>>>>>> moment? > > > > >>>>>>>>> Are there any technical issues that block you from merging > > the > > > > >>>>> changes? > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> -- > > > > >>>>>>>>> Denis > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 10:03 PM Peter Ivanov < > > > > mr.wei...@gmail.com> > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Ok, then I will update issue code and start preparation > for > > > > build > > > > >>>>>>>>>> configuration changes. > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 7 Jun 2018 at 23:41, Denis Magda < > dma...@apache.org > > > > > > > >>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> With which one — current implementation in issue? > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> That's the answer to your question: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 1. quickly fix all of them (can be solved by preliminary > > > > >>>>>>>> preparations — > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> searching for -fabric- usages in build configuration); > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> 2. update all branches to master because otherwise old > > > branch > > > > >>>>>>>> will > > > > >>>>>>>>>> stop > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> building. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:12 PM, Petr Ivanov < > > > > mr.wei...@gmail.com > > > > >>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Jun 2018, at 23:04, Denis Magda < > dma...@apache.org> > > > > >>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm fine with the suggested approach. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> With which one — current implementation in issue? > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> However, not sure we need to update > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> all the branches. Can't branch owners just pull the > > changes > > > > >>>>>>> back > > > > >>>>>>>>> from > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> master if the plan to merge back later? > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> Of course, we as an initiative group of this issue > should > > do > > > > >>>>>>>> nothing, > > > > >>>>>>>>>> it > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> will lie on shoulders of developers. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Petr Ivanov < > > > > >>>>>>>> mr.wei...@gmail.com> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> The most simple approach — repack and rearchive binary > > > > archive > > > > >>>>>>>>> after > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> release build, however that would not resolve the > > problem > > > > >>>>>>>> globally > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> (and > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> will require fixing every build configuration we have > on > > > > >>>>>>>>> TeamCity). > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Current approach implemented in task — creates already > > > > correct > > > > >>>>>>>>>> folder > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary archive name, but old name (with -fabric-) is > > used > > > in > > > > >>>>>>>>> almost > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> every > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> build configuration too and merge code to master will > > > > require > > > > >>>>>>>> to: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. quickly fix all of them (can be solved by > preliminary > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> preparations > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> — searching for -fabric- usages in build > configuration); > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. update all branches to master because otherwise old > > > > >>>>>>> branch > > > > >>>>>>>>>> will > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> stop building. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT? > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 7 Jun 2018, at 22:42, Denis Magda < > > dma...@apache.org> > > > > >>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Petr, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for pulling up the conversation. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I still prefer us not to complicate the things and > just > > > > >>>>>>> remove > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> "fabric" > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> from the *package name*. Use the easiest way > possible. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Personally, I don't care about Hadoop and would not > > > suggest > > > > >>>>>>> the > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> community > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wasting its time on it. So, just rename the > > > > suffixes/prefixes > > > > >>>>>>>> of > > > > >>>>>>>>>> the > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> build > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> files the way you like to address Anton's concerns. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 1:49 AM, Petr Ivanov < > > > > >>>>>>>> mr.wei...@gmail.com > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lets define once again what should be done in this > [1] > > > > task? > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If current implementation is good, than I’ll update > it > > > to > > > > >>>>>>>> master > > > > >>>>>>>>>> and > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> pass > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> for review. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yet, there is other part of the task which concerns > > our > > > > >>>>>>> build > > > > >>>>>>>>>> server > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> — I > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> assume that almost all our build configurations will > > > fail > > > > >>>>>>> due > > > > >>>>>>>> to > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> name > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> change and there is no simple way of updating > > > > configurations > > > > >>>>>>>>> other > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> then > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge task to master and start fixing failing > builds. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 10 Feb 2018, at 01:56, Denis Magda < > > > dma...@apache.org > > > > > > > > > >>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think we necessarily need to remove > 'fabric' > > > > word > > > > >>>>>>>> from > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> every > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the project, we just need to rename the name of > > > > >>>>>>>>> downloadable > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> package. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Couldn’t say it better than you, Val. Thanks for > > > pitching > > > > >>>>>>> in > > > > >>>>>>>> :) > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> This > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> is > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> exactly what the ticket is about. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 9, 2018, at 11:53 AM, Valentin Kulichenko < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anton, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't think we necessarily need to remove > 'fabric' > > > > word > > > > >>>>>>>> from > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> every > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> file > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in the project, we just need to rename the name of > > > > >>>>>>>>> downloadable > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package. Is > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> there any other place where 'fabric' is exposed to > > the > > > > >>>>>>> user? > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If that's the case, it should not be a big change, > > no? > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -Val > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 9, 2018 at 3:49 AM, Anton Vinogradov < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avinogra...@gridgain.com> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You're proposing changes without viewing a code > :) > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 10:07 PM, Denis Magda < > > > > >>>>>>>>>> dma...@apache.org> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anton, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> What’s wrong if we just go ahead and: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - replace “fabric” with “ignite” > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - replace “hadoop” with “ignite-hadoop" > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 8, 2018, at 1:51 AM, Anton Vinogradov < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avinogra...@gridgain.com > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "hadoop" and "fabric" words work on same > engine. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We have special assembly desctiptors, for > > example: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies-fabric.xml > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies-fabric-lgpl.xml > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dependencies-hadoop.xml > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-base.xml > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-fabric.xml > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-fabric-base.xml > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-fabric-lgpl.xml > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release-hadoop.xml > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So, I'ts impossible for now to remove "fabric" > > > > without > > > > >>>>>>>>>> "hadoop" > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> removal. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Only one case is to make some ditry hack, but > > > that's > > > > >>>>>>> not > > > > >>>>>>>> a > > > > >>>>>>>>>> good > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> idea. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 11:29 AM, Sergey Kozlov > < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> skoz...@gridgain.com > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 hadoop accelerator removing for AI 2.5 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Also probably IGFS should be either removed or > > > > >>>>>>>> refactored, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> e.g. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> create > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> FS > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> directly over the data region without using > > > "cache" > > > > >>>>>>>> entity > > > > >>>>>>>>>> as > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> an > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> intermidiate stage > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 2:13 AM, Denis Magda < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> dma...@apache.org> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Anton, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don’t get how the hadoop editions are > related > > > to > > > > >>>>>>> this > > > > >>>>>>>>>> task. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> The > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> is not named as “data fabric” for a while. > > Check > > > up > > > > >>>>>>> the > > > > >>>>>>>>>> site > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> or > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> docs. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> The “fabric” word is being removed from all > > over > > > > the > > > > >>>>>>>>> places > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> and > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> needs > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> be removed from the editions’ names. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> As for the hadoop future, my personal > position > > is > > > > to > > > > >>>>>>>>> retire > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> this > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> component > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and forget about it. I would restart the > > > > conversation > > > > >>>>>>>>> again > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> after > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> we > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> done > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with 2.4. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Feb 7, 2018, at 2:13 AM, Anton > Vinogradov < > > > > >>>>>>>>>> a...@apache.org > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis, Petr, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I checked PR and found we have > > *overcomplicated* > > > > >>>>>>> logic > > > > >>>>>>>>>> with > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "fabric" > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "hadoop" postfixs. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do we really need to assembly 2 editions? > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "Hadoop" edition still valued? > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My proposal is to get rid of "hadoop" > edition > > > and > > > > >>>>>>>>> replace > > > > >>>>>>>>>> it > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> with > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> instruction of how to use "fabric" edition > > > > instead. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Instruction will be pretty easy -> move > > "hadoop" > > > > >>>>>>>> folder > > > > >>>>>>>>>> from > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "optional" > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> root directory :) > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> In that case we can just remove all postfix > > > logic > > > > >>>>>>> from > > > > >>>>>>>>>> maven > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> poms > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> simplify release process. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 9:20 PM, Denis > Magda < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> dma...@apache.org > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Petr, thanks for solving it! > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hope that Anton V. or some other build > master > > > > will > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> double-check > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> changes and merge them. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 28, 2017, at 8:29 AM, Petr Ivanov < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> mr.wei...@gmail.com > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7251 is done, needs review and some > > > > >>>>>>>> additional > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> tests. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> See > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> PR > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> #3315 [1]. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] > > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3315 > > > > < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/3315 > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 20 Dec 2017, at 23:15, Denis Magda < > > > > >>>>>>>>>> dma...@apache.org > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Petr, thanks, such a swift turnaround! > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have you found the one who can asses and > > > review > > > > >>>>>>> the > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> changes? > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maintainers label might be helpful. Just > > ping > > > > >>>>>>> them > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> directly: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/How+ > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-ReviewProcessandMaintainers > < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/ > > > > >>>>>>>>> confluence/display/IGNITE/How+ > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> to+Contribute#HowtoContribute-ReviewProcessandMaintainers> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 20, 2017, at 12:24 AM, Petr > Ivanov > > < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> mr.wei...@gmail.com> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Assigned myself — done the same work > while > > > > >>>>>>>> preparing > > > > >>>>>>>>>> RPM > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> package. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> But for fixing DEVNOTES.txt waiting for > > > review > > > > >>>>>>> and > > > > >>>>>>>>>> merge > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> of > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> IGNITE-7107 [1]. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/ > > > > >>>>>>>>> jira/browse/IGNITE-7107 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 19 Dec 2017, at 22:55, Denis Magda < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> dma...@apache.org > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> All the bids were accepted and the > > verdict > > > is > > > > >>>>>>>>>> executed: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7251 > > > > >>>>>>>>> < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/ > > > > jira/browse/IGNITE-7251> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Who is ready to pick this up? > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2017, at 5:35 AM, Anton > > > > Vinogradov > > > > >>>>>>> < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> avinogra...@gridgain.com> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1б фо шур > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 9:59 AM, > > Vladimir > > > > >>>>>>>> Ozerov < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> voze...@gridgain.com> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1б вуаштшеудн > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:34 AM, > > Valentin > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Kulichenko > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> valentin.kuliche...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 12:24 PM, > > > Dmitriy > > > > >>>>>>>>>> Setrakyan > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dsetrak...@apache.org > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> +1 (completely agree) > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 10:21 AM, > > Denis > > > > >>>>>>>> Magda < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dma...@apache.org> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Igniters, > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache Ignite binary releases > still > > > > >>>>>>> include > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> “fabric” > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> word > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> their > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> names: > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ignite.apache.org/ > > > > >>>>>>>>> download.cgi#binaries > > > > >>>>>>>>>> < > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://ignite.apache.org/ > > > > >>>>>>>>> download.cgi#binaries > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> For instance, this is a full name > > of > > > > the > > > > >>>>>>>>>> previous > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> apache-ignite-fabric-2.3.0-bin. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It’s a little oversight on our > side > > > > >>>>>>> because > > > > >>>>>>>>> the > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> project > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> has > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> not > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> been > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> positioned as a fabric for a > while. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Proposal! Remove “fabric” from the > > > name > > > > >>>>>>> and > > > > >>>>>>>>> have > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> the > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> binary > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> releases > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> named > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> as - apache-ignite-{version}-bin. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> If we’re in consensus then let’s > > make > > > > the > > > > >>>>>>>>> change > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> in > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> 2.4. > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> — > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Denis > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sergey Kozlov > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> GridGain Systems > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> www.gridgain.com > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>>> > > > > >>>>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>>> > > > > >>>> > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
