Eduard, +1 for that topic.
I don't see any reasons to use these abbreviations at all and vote to deprecate them. If anybody can explain why we still need them (less number of letters in variable names is not an argument) we can discuss and revisit the current list. >From my side of view, these abbreviations just worsen readability of code and don't give any major benefits. вт, 16 окт. 2018 г. в 19:01, Eduard Shangareev <eduard.shangar...@gmail.com >: > Igniters, > > I want to discuss the appendix of our code-style: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Abbreviation+Rules. > > First of all, there is no any mention that it is a mandatory part. > > Secondly, some of them are very unintuitive and even misleading. For > example, cp. In current realization, it could mean not only copy but > checkpoint. Other example, proto... Would you get that it is protocol? > > Thirdly, the recommended plugin highlights even parts of multiword names. > It provokes to used creepy names as > locCpPartitionsInProgress, needCpPartitions and so on. > > So, I want to start a discussion for > 1. revising the list of abbreviations, > 2. stop using them for multi-word names, > 3. and make them not mandatory at all (what it is actually already true, > because of no any mention in the main code-style article). >
