+1 Eduard, I totally agree with you that it is misleading. I believe developer/reviewer able to choose convenient name in each particular case by themself. In my opinion abbreviation should be not mandatory.
-- Best regards, Anton Kalashnikov 16.10.2018, 19:01, "Eduard Shangareev" <eduard.shangar...@gmail.com>: > Igniters, > > I want to discuss the appendix of our code-style: > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/IGNITE/Abbreviation+Rules. > > First of all, there is no any mention that it is a mandatory part. > > Secondly, some of them are very unintuitive and even misleading. For > example, cp. In current realization, it could mean not only copy but > checkpoint. Other example, proto... Would you get that it is protocol? > > Thirdly, the recommended plugin highlights even parts of multiword names. > It provokes to used creepy names as > locCpPartitionsInProgress, needCpPartitions and so on. > > So, I want to start a discussion for > 1. revising the list of abbreviations, > 2. stop using them for multi-word names, > 3. and make them not mandatory at all (what it is actually already true, > because of no any mention in the main code-style article).
