Hello Ivan,

I have updated the PR as per our discussion.

Please review and share your feedback.

Regards,
Saikat

On Sun, Sep 1, 2019 at 3:20 PM Saikat Maitra <saikat.mai...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Ivan,
>
> I have taken care of review comments and also have shared a question for
> the application of default Query timeout value.
>
> Can you please review and share feedback?
>
> Regards,
> Saikat
>
> On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 7:22 PM Saikat Maitra <saikat.mai...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ivan,
>>
>> Thank you, I have shared my comments and have few questions related to
>> the issue.
>>
>> Please take a look and share your thoughts.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Saikat
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 4:03 PM Павлухин Иван <vololo...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Saikat,
>>>
>>> I left a comment in JIRA ticket [1]. Also, I invited Andrey to help
>>> with a further review.
>>>
>>> Andrey, could you please step in and continue the review?
>>> Unfortunately, for a couple of weeks I have limited access to my
>>> computer and cannot do a review in a timely manner.
>>>
>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7285
>>>
>>> 2019-08-19 7:24 GMT+11:00, Saikat Maitra <saikat.mai...@gmail.com>:
>>> > Hi Ivan,
>>> >
>>> > I have updated the PR and made changes in IgniteH2Indexing for query
>>> > timeout so that default query timeout get used during query execution.
>>> >
>>> > Please take a look and let me know if this change looks good.
>>> >
>>> > I will update tests if the approach looks good.
>>> >
>>> > PR https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/6490
>>> >
>>> > Regards,
>>> >
>>> > Saikat
>>> >
>>> > On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 8:30 PM Saikat Maitra <saikat.mai...@gmail.com
>>> >
>>> > wrote:
>>> >
>>> >> Hi Ivan, Denis
>>> >>
>>> >> Thank you for your feedback, I am looking into the changes needed for
>>> >> this
>>> >> issue.
>>> >>
>>> >> I am also looking into these configurations parameters
>>> >> https://apacheignite.readme.io/v2.2/docs/configuration-parameters to
>>> see
>>> >> if there are similar attributes being used in  SqlFieldsQuery and
>>> >> SqlQuery.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >>
>>> >> Saikat
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 6:13 AM Павлухин Иван <vololo...@gmail.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >>> Saikat, Denis,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I left comments in the ticket [1].
>>> >>>
>>> >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7285
>>> >>>
>>> >>> вт, 13 авг. 2019 г. в 21:53, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org>:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Hi Saikat,
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > Thanks for a quick turnaround! Ivan, could you please step in and
>>> do a
>>> >>> > review?
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > -
>>> >>> > Denis
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 6:26 AM Saikat Maitra
>>> >>> > <saikat.mai...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> > wrote:
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > > Hi Denis, Ivan
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > > As discussed I have updated the PR and incorporated review
>>> comments.
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/6490/files
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > > Please take a look and share your feedback.
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > > Regard,
>>> >>> > > Saikat
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > > On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 5:51 PM Saikat Maitra <
>>> >>> saikat.mai...@gmail.com>
>>> >>> > > wrote:
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > > > Hello Denis, Ivan
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > > > Yes, I can take up the changes for IGNITE-7825.
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > > > I had a doubt on the usage of the Default Query Timeout.
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > > > I had raised the PR in an assumption that Default Query Timeout
>>> >>> will only
>>> >>> > > > be used if user had not provided Cache Query Timeout
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > > > https://github.com/apache/ignite/pull/6490/files
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > > > I wanted to discuss if it is correct intended usage of Default
>>> >>> > > > Query
>>> >>> > > > Timeout or should we reconsider?
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > > > Regards,
>>> >>> > > > Saikat
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > > > On Fri, Aug 9, 2019 at 12:11 PM Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org
>>> >
>>> >>> wrote:
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > > >> Ivan, thanks for sharing this discussion. Let's use it for our
>>> >>> > > >> conversation.
>>> >>> > > >>
>>> >>> > > >> -
>>> >>> > > >> Denis
>>> >>> > > >>
>>> >>> > > >>
>>> >>> > > >> On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 11:15 PM Павлухин Иван
>>> >>> > > >> <vololo...@gmail.com
>>> >>> >
>>> >>> > > >> wrote:
>>> >>> > > >>
>>> >>> > > >> > Just for the protocol. There was an original dev-list
>>> >>> > > >> > discussion
>>> >>> [1].
>>> >>> > > >> > Added a link to the ticket as well.
>>> >>> > > >> >
>>> >>> > > >> > [1]
>>> >>> > > >> >
>>> >>> > > >>
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>>
>>> http://apache-ignite-developers.2346864.n4.nabble.com/IGNITE-7285-Add-default-query-timeout-td41828.html
>>> >>> > > >> >
>>> >>> > > >> > пт, 9 авг. 2019 г. в 01:22, Denis Magda <dma...@apache.org
>>> >:
>>> >>> > > >> > >
>>> >>> > > >> > > Hey Saikat,
>>> >>> > > >> > >
>>> >>> > > >> > > Are you still working on this ticket?
>>> >>> > > >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-7285
>>> >>> > > >> > >
>>> >>> > > >> > > Seems that's the last API that doesn't support timeouts -
>>> >>> > > >> > > JDBC
>>> >>> and
>>> >>> > > >> ODBC
>>> >>> > > >> > > drivers already go with it.
>>> >>> > > >> > >
>>> >>> > > >> > > If you don't have time to complete the changes then
>>> someone
>>> >>> else
>>> >>> > > from
>>> >>> > > >> the
>>> >>> > > >> > > community can take over. We see a lot of demand for this
>>> API
>>> >>> and
>>> >>> > > here
>>> >>> > > >> is
>>> >>> > > >> > > one example:
>>> >>> > > >> > >
>>> >>> > > >> >
>>> >>> > > >>
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>>
>>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57275301/how-to-set-a-query-timeout-for-apache-ignite-cache
>>> >>> > > >> > >
>>> >>> > > >> > > -
>>> >>> > > >> > > Denis
>>> >>> > > >> >
>>> >>> > > >> >
>>> >>> > > >> >
>>> >>> > > >> > --
>>> >>> > > >> > Best regards,
>>> >>> > > >> > Ivan Pavlukhin
>>> >>> > > >> >
>>> >>> > > >>
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Best regards,
>>> >>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best regards,
>>> Ivan Pavlukhin
>>>
>>

Reply via email to