Hi Gunnar, I think Barbara Gomes is working on #2 from your list below. So we should have all three points covered. -Tony
> On Feb 10, 2017, at 10:43 PM, Gunnar Tapper <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Rutvij, > > Nice to "meet" you. > > I want to be clear that one of the *committers* have to create the release. > The steps outlined in the Contributor Guide should get whomever takes on the > task through what's needed but let's expect a few misfires. > > From what I've seen, it takes time with all the prep work so there's no real > need to wait. For example, I'm hoping that one of the mentors can help get > the PGP signed once it's been created. > > Do y'all have a target date in mind for a first release? I find that things > get done when we all have a mental milestone in place. :) > > Thanks, > > Gunnar > > > > On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 1:14 PM, Rutvij Clerk <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > Hi Gunnar, > > I would be happy to work with you on preparing the release. In general, I > agree with the scope of proposal for the v0.1 release. > > I would be happy to volunteer for #1. > > Thanks, > > Rutvij > > On Feb 09, 2017, at 09:46 AM, Gunnar Tapper <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've been thinking about the 0.1 release. As stated before, the first step >> of any Apache incubation project is to learn how to operate in the Apache >> world. >> >> From a release purpose, I propose the following focus areas: >> >> 1. Ensure that the source tree is a source tree. From what I understand >> (Justin can verify), the source tree should not contain; for example, jar >> files but the source and means to build the "binaries" and package them up. >> 2. Build instructions. People outside the project needs to be able to build >> the code. >> 3. Release artifacts. Package up the project into a tar file ensuring that >> all the release requirements are met. >> >> That's it for 0.1. I recommend that other functions (install, test >> libraries, etc.) can wait to later releases. >> >> Would this work? If so, who can take care of #1 and #2 so that we can move >> to #3? >> >> -- >> Thanks, >> >> Gunnar >> If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right. > > > > -- > Thanks, > > Gunnar > If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.
