+1 On Tue, Nov 7, 2017 at 8:10 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > Just want to point out. Podlings retire, they don't go to the attic. The > same concepts apply though. > > John > > On 2017-11-07 20:25, Tony Faustini <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi, we have had several days to get feedback on whether or not to move > the iota podling to ‘attic’ status. There has been some interest in keeping > the project alive but a number of the principal committers have suggested > that the project be moved to ‘attic’ status. Moving the project to the > attic status doesn’t mean that the source code is unavailable nor does it > mean that a community cannot be build around such a project. Perhaps Justin > or Hadrian could give some guidance on working and building community > around a project that is in the ‘attic’? > > > > Based on the feedback I am putting the question of moving iota to > ‘attic’ status to a vote. > > > > The vote is open for at least 72 hours and passes if a majority of at > least > > 3 +1 PMC votes are cast. > > > > [ ] +1 move iota to attic status > > [ ] -1 Do not move iota to attic status because ... > > > > Thanks > > -Tony > > > > > On Oct 31, 2017, at 2:31 PM, Barbara Malta Gomes < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > I recommend moving the project to Attic as well. > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 9:44 AM, <[email protected] <mailto: > [email protected]>> wrote: > > > I recommend moving the project to Attic in its current state. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Rutvij > > > > > > On Oct 31, 2017, 7:02 AM -0700, Sandeep Purohit <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>, wrote: > > >> Hi All, We have to move forward as a podling project. I am interested > in this project, Please make this project alive again. Anyone have design > documents and any information related to this project then we all should > make this project active again. > > >> > > >> -Sandeep > > >> > > >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 2:51 PM, Gunnar Tapper < > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >> My suggestion is to place the project in the attic at this point. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> Gunnar > > >> > > >> On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 3:51 AM, Xi Chen <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >> Hi, All, > > >> > > >> This is Neil, I am new to the software engineering industry and I am > interested in this project, and hope to make contribute to this project. > > >> As I am new to this project, I don’t know how to begin with it. If > some of you still got interests in this project, I hope you guys can reply > this email, I need your help to learn more about this project. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> Neil > > >> > > >> > On Oct 30, 2017, at 2:42 PM, Tony Faustini <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > >> > > > >> > Hi all, I am not seeing a lot of activity on this project in the > last few months. I would like to start a discussion on whether or not to > dissolve the PMC and move the project to the Attic. This doesn’t > necessarily mean that the project cannot re-emerge at a future time as an > ASF project. It would be shelved in the attic for now. The source code > would still be available under the Apache license as is the case with many > open source projects. Perhaps a community will emerge in the near future > and we the project can be moved back to the ASF podling process. > > >> > > > >> > On the other hand if you want to keep the project moving forward as > a podling project and you feel you have the time to volunteer please > respond to this thread explaining how you can help. > > >> > > > >> > I am proposing that we discuss the Attic question for a few days > and based on the feedback we either > > >> > > > >> > 1) Have enough volunteers to move this forward as a podling project > > >> > > > >> > or > > >> > > > >> > 2) We conduct a vote to dissolve the PMC and move the project to > the Attic > > >> > > > >> > I look forward to your feedback. > > >> > > > >> > Thanks > > >> > > > >> > -Tony > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> Gunnar > > >> If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right. > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Barbara Gomes > > > Computer Engineer > > > San Jose, CA > > > > > -- Thanks, Gunnar *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*
