+1 On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think there is, or could be enough PPMC to provide oversight, but that's > not the point. I understand your perception, but that (true or not) is a > consequence of lack of activity on the project. One cannot have more active > oversight than active contributors. > > Unfortunately contributions were limited to mostly 2 people and even those > were in bursts. A release of something useful to a larger audience was > constantly delayed. We all agree that the execution did not follow the > vision and the interest expressed is not backed up by contributions. > > I do not see any reason to delay the move to attic, even by a few days. > > Hadrian > > On 01/04/2018 03:30 AM, Justin Mclean wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I believe you need a vote on the IPMC general list to do that right? >> >> While there does seem some interest from some people outside the project >> I don't see any pull requests or on list discussion on what to do and I >> have some doubts if there enough of a PPMC to continue oversight of the >> project. >> >> Lets give it a few days and see if anyone else says anything and if not >> then hold a vote there. >> >> Thanks, >> Justin >> >> -- Thanks, Gunnar *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*
