I suspect we can consider this a positive vote, as a result does it make sense
to move on to the general@incubator vote?
On 2018/01/04 17:49:43, Gunnar Tapper <tapper.gun...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 9:19 AM, Hadrian Zbarcea <hzbar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I think there is, or could be enough PPMC to provide oversight, but that's
> > not the point. I understand your perception, but that (true or not) is a
> > consequence of lack of activity on the project. One cannot have more active
> > oversight than active contributors.
> > Unfortunately contributions were limited to mostly 2 people and even those
> > were in bursts. A release of something useful to a larger audience was
> > constantly delayed. We all agree that the execution did not follow the
> > vision and the interest expressed is not backed up by contributions.
> > I do not see any reason to delay the move to attic, even by a few days.
> > Hadrian
> > On 01/04/2018 03:30 AM, Justin Mclean wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >> I believe you need a vote on the IPMC general list to do that right?
> >> While there does seem some interest from some people outside the project
> >> I don't see any pull requests or on list discussion on what to do and I
> >> have some doubts if there enough of a PPMC to continue oversight of the
> >> project.
> >> Lets give it a few days and see if anyone else says anything and if not
> >> then hold a vote there.
> >> Thanks,
> >> Justin
> *If you think you can you can, if you think you can't you're right.*