Hi, guys

Sorry, I put the vote content in another email. I will add it here.


> Hi, guys

I'd like to get a little advice from you.

The following are three formats of printing performance tracing log file:

[1]
-----------------------------
Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 20:02:22.205
Query Id: 2 - Query Statement: select * from root
Query Id: 2 - Number of series paths: 3
Query Id: 2 - Number of tsfiles: 2
Query Id: 2 - Number of sequence files: 2
Query Id: 2 - Number of unsequence files: 0
Query Id: 2 - Number of chunks: 3
Query Id: 2 - Average size of chunks: 4113

[2]
-----------------------------
Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 19:38:35.109 | Query Statement: select
* from root | Number of series paths: 3
Query Id: 2 - Number of tsfiles: 2 | Number of sequence files: 2 | Number
of unsequence files: 0
Query Id: 2 - Number of chunks: 3 | Average size of chunks: 4113

[3]
-----------------------------
Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 19:38:35.109, Query Statement: select
* from root, Number of series paths: 3
Query Id: 2 - Number of tsfiles: 2, Number of sequence files: 2, Number of
unsequence files: 0
Query Id: 2 - Number of chunks: 3, Average size of chunks: 4113

Which do you prefer? Any other suggestions are OK.

Please leave your opinion.

田原 <tian...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> 于2020年6月23日周二 下午9:08写道:

> Hi,
>
> xiangwei
>
> I prefer the first one.
>
> vote for [1].
>
> Best,
> ---------------
> Yuan Tian
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Best,
Xiangwei Wei

Reply via email to