Hi, guys Sorry, I put the vote content in another email. I will add it here.
> Hi, guys I'd like to get a little advice from you. The following are three formats of printing performance tracing log file: [1] ----------------------------- Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 20:02:22.205 Query Id: 2 - Query Statement: select * from root Query Id: 2 - Number of series paths: 3 Query Id: 2 - Number of tsfiles: 2 Query Id: 2 - Number of sequence files: 2 Query Id: 2 - Number of unsequence files: 0 Query Id: 2 - Number of chunks: 3 Query Id: 2 - Average size of chunks: 4113 [2] ----------------------------- Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 19:38:35.109 | Query Statement: select * from root | Number of series paths: 3 Query Id: 2 - Number of tsfiles: 2 | Number of sequence files: 2 | Number of unsequence files: 0 Query Id: 2 - Number of chunks: 3 | Average size of chunks: 4113 [3] ----------------------------- Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 19:38:35.109, Query Statement: select * from root, Number of series paths: 3 Query Id: 2 - Number of tsfiles: 2, Number of sequence files: 2, Number of unsequence files: 0 Query Id: 2 - Number of chunks: 3, Average size of chunks: 4113 Which do you prefer? Any other suggestions are OK. Please leave your opinion. 田原 <tian...@mails.tsinghua.edu.cn> 于2020年6月23日周二 下午9:08写道: > Hi, > > xiangwei > > I prefer the first one. > > vote for [1]. > > Best, > --------------- > Yuan Tian > > > > > -- Best, Xiangwei Wei