Hi，
I have a question. Why not print all the information on the same line? Will multiple lines lead to messy printing under multiple threads. Example: Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 20:02:22.205 Query Id: 6 - Start time: 2020-06-23 20:02:22.205 Query Id: 6 - Query Statement: select * from root Query Id: 2 - Query Statement: select * from root Query Id: 2 - Number of series paths: 3 Query Id: 2 - Number of tsfiles: 2 Query Id: 2 - Number of sequence files: 2 Query Id: 6 - Number of series paths: 3 Query Id: 2 - Number of unsequence files: 0 Query Id: 2 - Number of chunks: 3 Query Id: 2 - Average size of chunks: 4113 Best, ————————————————— Dawei Liu On 06/28/2020 15:51，Xiangdong Huang<[email protected]> wrote： I suggest formatting the log for being easily analyzed in the future. Yes, it will be better if we can use `grep` or some other Linux commands to get a structured format. Best, ----------------------------------- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Jialin Qiao <[email protected]> 于2020年6月28日周日 上午11:31写道： Hi, [1] is ok. I suggest formatting the log for being easily analyzed in the future. Thanks, -- Jialin Qiao School of Software, Tsinghua University 乔嘉林 清华大学 软件学院 -----原始邮件----- 发件人: "孙泽嵩" <[email protected]> 发送时间: 2020-06-24 00:45:23 (星期三) 收件人: [email protected] 抄送: 主题: Re: [VOTE] Vote for formats of printing performance tracing log file: Hi Xiangwei, I vote for [1] since it’s more clear and in alignment. Best, ----------------------------------- Zesong Sun School of Software, Tsinghua University 孙泽嵩 清华大学 软件学院 2020年6月23日 23:31，Xiangdong Huang <[email protected]> 写道： Hi, Also vote for the first format. By the way, can we add more info, e.g., - the ratio of reading from (metadata and data) cache - how many chunks that just the headers are read. Best, ----------------------------------- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Xiangwei Wei <[email protected]> 于2020年6月23日周二 下午9:23写道： Hi, guys Sorry, I put the vote content in another email. I will add it here. Hi, guys I'd like to get a little advice from you. The following are three formats of printing performance tracing log file: [1] ----------------------------- Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 20:02:22.205 Query Id: 2 - Query Statement: select * from root Query Id: 2 - Number of series paths: 3 Query Id: 2 - Number of tsfiles: 2 Query Id: 2 - Number of sequence files: 2 Query Id: 2 - Number of unsequence files: 0 Query Id: 2 - Number of chunks: 3 Query Id: 2 - Average size of chunks: 4113 [2] ----------------------------- Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 19:38:35.109 | Query Statement: select * from root | Number of series paths: 3 Query Id: 2 - Number of tsfiles: 2 | Number of sequence files: 2 | Number of unsequence files: 0 Query Id: 2 - Number of chunks: 3 | Average size of chunks: 4113 [3] ----------------------------- Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 19:38:35.109, Query Statement: select * from root, Number of series paths: 3 Query Id: 2 - Number of tsfiles: 2, Number of sequence files: 2, Number of unsequence files: 0 Query Id: 2 - Number of chunks: 3, Average size of chunks: 4113 Which do you prefer? Any other suggestions are OK. Please leave your opinion. 田原 <[email protected]> 于2020年6月23日周二 下午9:08写道： Hi, xiangwei I prefer the first one. vote for [1]. Best, --------------- Yuan Tian -- Best, Xiangwei Wei
