> I suggest formatting the log for being easily analyzed in the future. Yes, it will be better if we can use `grep` or some other Linux commands to get a structured format.
Best, ----------------------------------- Xiangdong Huang School of Software, Tsinghua University 黄向东 清华大学 软件学院 Jialin Qiao <[email protected]> 于2020年6月28日周日 上午11:31写道： > Hi, > > [1] is ok. I suggest formatting the log for being easily analyzed in the > future. > > Thanks, > -- > Jialin Qiao > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > 乔嘉林 > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > -----原始邮件----- > > 发件人: "孙泽嵩" <[email protected]> > > 发送时间: 2020-06-24 00:45:23 (星期三) > > 收件人: [email protected] > > 抄送: > > 主题: Re: [VOTE] Vote for formats of printing performance tracing log file: > > > > Hi Xiangwei, > > > > I vote for [1] since it’s more clear and in alignment. > > > > > > Best, > > ----------------------------------- > > Zesong Sun > > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > > > 孙泽嵩 > > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > > > 2020年6月23日 23:31，Xiangdong Huang <[email protected]> 写道： > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Also vote for the first format. > > > > > > By the way, can we add more info, e.g., > > > > > > - the ratio of reading from (metadata and data) cache > > > - how many chunks that just the headers are read. > > > > > > Best, > > > ----------------------------------- > > > Xiangdong Huang > > > School of Software, Tsinghua University > > > > > > 黄向东 > > > 清华大学 软件学院 > > > > > > > > > Xiangwei Wei <[email protected]> 于2020年6月23日周二 下午9:23写道： > > > > > >> Hi, guys > > >> > > >> Sorry, I put the vote content in another email. I will add it here. > > >> > > >> > > >>> Hi, guys > > >> > > >> I'd like to get a little advice from you. > > >> > > >> The following are three formats of printing performance tracing log > file: > > >> > > >> [1] > > >> ----------------------------- > > >> Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 20:02:22.205 > > >> Query Id: 2 - Query Statement: select * from root > > >> Query Id: 2 - Number of series paths: 3 > > >> Query Id: 2 - Number of tsfiles: 2 > > >> Query Id: 2 - Number of sequence files: 2 > > >> Query Id: 2 - Number of unsequence files: 0 > > >> Query Id: 2 - Number of chunks: 3 > > >> Query Id: 2 - Average size of chunks: 4113 > > >> > > >> [2] > > >> ----------------------------- > > >> Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 19:38:35.109 | Query Statement: > select > > >> * from root | Number of series paths: 3 > > >> Query Id: 2 - Number of tsfiles: 2 | Number of sequence files: 2 | > Number > > >> of unsequence files: 0 > > >> Query Id: 2 - Number of chunks: 3 | Average size of chunks: 4113 > > >> > > >> [3] > > >> ----------------------------- > > >> Query Id: 2 - Start time: 2020-06-23 19:38:35.109, Query Statement: > select > > >> * from root, Number of series paths: 3 > > >> Query Id: 2 - Number of tsfiles: 2, Number of sequence files: 2, > Number of > > >> unsequence files: 0 > > >> Query Id: 2 - Number of chunks: 3, Average size of chunks: 4113 > > >> > > >> Which do you prefer? Any other suggestions are OK. > > >> > > >> Please leave your opinion. > > >> > > >> 田原 <[email protected]> 于2020年6月23日周二 下午9:08写道： > > >> > > >>> Hi, > > >>> > > >>> xiangwei > > >>> > > >>> I prefer the first one. > > >>> > > >>> vote for [1]. > > >>> > > >>> Best, > > >>> --------------- > > >>> Yuan Tian > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Best, > > >> Xiangwei Wei > > >> > > >
