Dear Andi,

Thank you so much for your kind reply. I agree that targeting v2 for the 
assessment would be sensible and the milestone release and the demo app could 
be just fine for our purposes.

We'll have a look at the docker image and play a bit with the demo app to get 
familiarized with them; thank you very much for pointing us to those resources, 
they'll be of great help.

Regards.

On 2020/04/05 06:48:01, Andi Huber <[email protected]> wrote: 
> Dear Paulo,
> 
> I'm one of the more involved developers on Apache Isis. I'm happy to help you 
> getting started with the framework or answer questions.
> 
> I'd say at least 90% of our current effort goes into work on Apache Isis 
> Version 2. The final release might still take some couple of months, but we 
> do have intermediate milestone releases on our way there. We just released 
> Milestone 3.
> 
> I think for us, it would make more sense having Apache Isis Version 2 
> assessed, even though we have no final release yet.
> 
> For starters, we do have a Docker Image [1]  that's built on a daily basis, 
> showcasing many of the framework features. You might consider whether this 
> application can be used as a starting point for your assessment.
> 
> You might also consider having Slack chats with me and our community. Feel 
> free to join via [2].
> 
> Cheers Andi
> 
> [1] https://hub.docker.com/r/apacheisis/demo-springboot
> [2] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ISIS/Signing+up+to+Slack
> 
> On 2020/04/05 00:19:52, Paulo Cesar Sequeira Gutierrez 
> <[email protected]> wrote: 
> > Dear Apache Isis Developers,
> > 
> > My name is Paulo Sequeira and I am studying at a Master's in Cybersecurity
> > program at Universidad Cenfotec, Costa Rica.
> > 
> > I'm writing to let you know that a colleague and I have become interested
> > in the work you're doing with the Apache Isis framework and making it the
> > subject of some research we are carrying out at this time.
> > 
> > In this research we want to assess the impact and benefits that the
> > framework provides to the security of applications based on it; our
> > hypothesis is that, similarly to how the framework can enable greater
> > productivity by letting the developer focus more on the domain modeling and
> > the business logic, liberating him from having to deal with low-level,
> > complex and overwhelming details of properly implementing a working UI, the
> > framework can also improve the baseline security of the resulting
> > application because many common security vulnerabilities arise from those
> > aspects of the application implementation that it may already be taking
> > care of on behalf of the developer: validation checks to prevent injection,
> > session management, XSS protection, access controls, and others.
> > 
> > Our preliminary review of research literature suggests these are aspects of
> > the Naked Objects approach or Apache Isis that may not have specifically
> > been targeted in studies, so that's where we want to focus on.
> > 
> > An initial step in this research would be to run example Apache Isis
> > applications through a security verification procedure (we have chosen the
> > OWASP Application Security Verification Standard as a starting point) to
> > assess the security baseline of the applications the framework currently
> > generates. But as you could imagine, such assessments may require
> > assistance on the part of developers of the application and the framework
> > being assessed; additionally, we would like to make sure that any findings
> > are properly reported and discussed with you before any publication (we
> > hope :-) ) takes place.
> > 
> > That's why we want to make that you aware of our intentions and to ask if
> > this initiative may be of interest to you, if cooperation with it is
> > feasible, and how you'd think it can best be carried out.
> > 
> > Thank you very much for your kind attention.
> > 
> > Cordially,
> > 
> > Paulo C. Sequeira GutiƩrrez
> > 
> 

Reply via email to