On 8/18/07, Jukka Zitting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > Late night ramblings... > > There's recently been a lot of talk about managing the database > connections (and transactions) of the Jackrabbit persistence managers. > It was even suggested that Jackrabbit be refactored so that each > session would map to a separate database connection. > > Improvements in the way an underlying database is used are of course > welcome, but in the big picture I don't like having the database being > a driving factor in Jackrabbit design. The way I see it we should be > moving further away from relational databases, towards a native > hierarchical storage model. > > I don't want Jackrabbit using a database, I want Jackrabbit *being* > the database!
i couldn't agree more... cheers stefan > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting >
