> > On the other hand I would really like to give people a means to > > work with large anonymous unordered collections. > > I think a feature that would address the "I have a bag of objects > > and I just want to persist them without thinking of a 'name' for > > each" usecase, would definitely be great. Maybe this could > > be the introduction of an addNode() without a childnode name. > A big +1 on that idea. > > "Store this and return me a path" would be really useful. Would it make > sense to allow the impl to choose the container as well? interesting twist, would that be a Session.addNode() vs. a Node.addNode() without a node name?
regards, david
