Hi, On Feb 8, 2008 5:48 PM, David Nuescheler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I think a feature that would address the "I have a bag of objects > and I just want to persist them without thinking of a 'name' for > each" usecase, would definitely be great. Maybe this could > be the introduction of an addNode() without a childnode name.
Good idea! We could also allow "*" as a wildcard child node name in the existing addNode() signatures. > > WDYT, is SNS worth the effort, or should we consider dropping it? > I don't think that it is problematic to have some features that are not > optimized. I think the issue runs deeper than just performance. We have at least one open issue, JCR-435, and given the fact that we guide people away from SNS at the first sings of trouble I wouldn't be surprised if there were other issues waiting. SNS code is quite complex and not very thoroughly tested. BR, Jukka Zitting
