David Nuescheler wrote:
On the other hand I would really like to give people a means to
work with large anonymous unordered collections.
I think a feature that would address the "I have a bag of objects
and I just want to persist them without thinking of a 'name' for
each" usecase, would definitely be great. Maybe this could
be the introduction of an addNode() without a childnode name.
A big +1 on that idea.
"Store this and return me a path" would be really useful. Would it make
sense to allow the impl to choose the container as well?
interesting twist, would that be a Session.addNode() vs. a Node.addNode()
without a node name?
Yes, it would allow the server to choose a location based on the node type.
I guess it would be confusing on Node :-).
BR, Julian
