Hi. I also has used Jcrom for a while. Not any fancy stuff, but plain basic mapping. It has problems, but I like the simplicity of the framework. Could even be simpler than it is right now. Have done some minor modifications that suites the project I used it on. I would really like to see this project be a part of Jackrabbit. Would also contribute some effort into fixing bugs and/or features.
Regards, Sten Roger Sandvik On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:02 AM, papke <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi everybody, > > we also decided to use jcrom as an ocm for our new content management > system. We think that it's a very lightweight solution to map object to a > content repository and we welcome it if it would be integrated in the > jackrabbit core. > > From our development experiences we now, that jcrom has still some problems > in the following fields: > - management of acls > - transaction support > - versioning > > But I think it this ocm solution would be a benefit to every jackrabbit > user. > > Regards > Christoph > > > Jukka Zitting wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:31 PM, ogg<[email protected]> wrote: > >> I'm finding that I have less and less time to maintain my open source > JCR > >> object mapping solution, JCROM (http://jcrom.org). > >> > >> Therefore I'm wondering whether there is any interest from you > Jackrabbit > >> people to take over the code base and possibly integrate it into your > >> Jackrabbit OCM? > > > > Sounds like a good idea! :-) > > > > However, are there JCROM users or developers who'd be willing to step > > up to fix issues and work on new features in case you don't have time > > to do that anymore? I'd rather not to adopt a codebase that nobody is > > working on. > > > > BR, > > > > Jukka Zitting > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/JCROM-and-Jackrabbit-OCM-tp25255760p25641695.html > Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
