Hi, Concerning Jackrabbit OCM,I am (unfortunately) the only committer for the project. For the moment, I have no time to work on it. That's the reason why the code didn't change for a long time.
Maybe I'm wrong but I think it is almost the same for JCROM. In a such situation, it should be nice to know : Who are using OCM or JCROM in the Jackrabbit community ? Who want to contribute to OCM or JCROM (this is certainly the most important question ) ? Will we plan to keep both projects ? Christophe 2009/9/29 Jukka Zitting <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Jason Thrasher <[email protected]> > wrote: >> What's the status of JCROM -> Jackrabbit idea, and OCM in Jackrabbit in >> general? It's not clear from reading the website, or the lists. > > There seems to be general interest to bringing JCROM to Jackrabbit, > and so far I see nobody objecting to the idea. > > To move forward on this, we need IP clearance [1] on JCROM and a > Jackrabbit VOTE on accepting the codebase. I'm happy to support the > process for all the parts that require an ASF officer, but it would be > great if we had volunteers for things like filling in the IP clearance > template [2]. > > [1] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/index.html > [2] http://incubator.apache.org/ip-clearance/ip-clearance-template.html > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting >
