Hi guys, I have used a lot both JCR OCM solution in my Igenko project. It was initally based on Jackrabbit OCM, et switch to JCROM.
With respect to Christophe Lombart work, JCROM is a far far far more simpler, powerful, well design solution for JCR mapping. It outperform Jackrabbit OCM in all domains, so switching to integrate JCROM codebase as the new Jackrabbit OCM solution would be a key point for Jackrabbit 2.0 success. Regards, Bouiaw ogg wrote: > > Hello people! > I'm finding that I have less and less time to maintain my open source JCR > object mapping solution, JCROM (http://jcrom.org). > > Therefore I'm wondering whether there is any interest from you Jackrabbit > people to take over the code base and possibly integrate it into your > Jackrabbit OCM? > > Cheers, > OGG > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/JCROM-and-Jackrabbit-OCM-tp25255760p25706579.html Sent from the Jackrabbit - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
