On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Bart van der Schans <[email protected]> wrote: > Or just add a comment "Closing since there was no activity for over 6 > months. Please reopen the issue if this is still relevant to you." and > then close the issues. I'm personally not a big fan of keeping a big > bag of open issues in a backlog. You will end up going over and over > again through the backlog issues to find the relevant ones.
I am fine with that as well. I just wanna get a clean sheet to start with and not have the obfuscating old issues from a couple of years ago. Let's see what others prefer Regards Ard > > Regards, > Bart > > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 12:05 PM, Ard Schrijvers > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Is everybody ok if I add a new version 'Backlog' for the OCM project, >> and move all current 'unscheduled', mainly very old, issues to it? >> I'll see which items I can pick up for the upcoming version. Also, if >> they look really outdated, I'd like to close them. >> >> please let me know if you do not agree with / like this >> >> Regards Ard >> >> -- >> Amsterdam - Oosteinde 11, 1017 WT Amsterdam >> Boston - 1 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02142 >> >> US +1 877 414 4776 (toll free) >> Europe +31(0)20 522 4466 >> www.onehippo.com > > > > -- > Amsterdam - Oosteinde 11, 1017 WT Amsterdam > Boston - 1 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02142 > > US +1 877 414 4776 (toll free) > Europe +31(0)20 522 4466 > www.onehippo.com -- Amsterdam - Oosteinde 11, 1017 WT Amsterdam Boston - 1 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02142 US +1 877 414 4776 (toll free) Europe +31(0)20 522 4466 www.onehippo.com
