On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Jukka Zitting <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Ard Schrijvers > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Let's see what others prefer > > I generally find that sorting open issues by the last update is enough > to filter out old and inactive issues. The other alternatives are > either quickly outdated (who'll take care of updating the list of > "backlog" issues over time?) or incorrect (inactivity does not > necessarily mean an issue is resolved or no longer relevant). The best > way to deal with old issues is for someone to actually spend a few > minutes per issue to review what's the current status and update or > resolve the issue accordingly. Until someone has the time and energy > for that I'd rather just leave the issues untouched. > > Anyway, given that you're the first one to seriously use the OCM > tracker for a while, I'd say whatever works for you is best. :-)
I'll go through all open issues, close them if needed, and if still relevant, leave them as is Regards Ard > > BR, > > Jukka Zitting -- Amsterdam - Oosteinde 11, 1017 WT Amsterdam Boston - 1 Broadway, Cambridge, MA 02142 US +1 877 414 4776 (toll free) Europe +31(0)20 522 4466 www.onehippo.com
