Hi, On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Ard Schrijvers <[email protected]> wrote: > Let's see what others prefer
I generally find that sorting open issues by the last update is enough to filter out old and inactive issues. The other alternatives are either quickly outdated (who'll take care of updating the list of "backlog" issues over time?) or incorrect (inactivity does not necessarily mean an issue is resolved or no longer relevant). The best way to deal with old issues is for someone to actually spend a few minutes per issue to review what's the current status and update or resolve the issue accordingly. Until someone has the time and energy for that I'd rather just leave the issues untouched. Anyway, given that you're the first one to seriously use the OCM tracker for a while, I'd say whatever works for you is best. :-) BR, Jukka Zitting
