I agree with everet and i have a some contributions for v1 once it made its way to the main jclouds project... On Jan 14, 2014 7:55 PM, "Everett Toews" <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't think there's any harm in keeping the v1 API around, apart from > the maintenance (of which there hasn't been any). > > The fact that the Image Service API v1 Reference is still linked to from > the OpenStack Docs [1] tells me that it's still in use and hasn't been > deprecated. As such we should still support it. > > When there are two versions, we should probably default to v2 to encourage > the use of the newer API but still make it trivially easy to switch to the > v1 API. > > Everett > > [1] http://docs.openstack.org/ > > > On Jan 14, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Jeremy Daggett wrote: > > > Hi Ignacio, > > > > This is great news on the Glance v2 API! > > > > My preference would be to completely remove the v1 API (since it was > never > > promoted from the labs project) and just move forward with v2. I can't > > imagine that anyone is even using the v1 API at this point, but I could > be > > wrong... > > > > If others on the list can provide additional perspective here, it would > be > > greatly appreciated. Thx! > > > > /jd > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Ignacio Mulas Viela < > [email protected] > >> wrote: > > > >> Hi all! > >> Hopefully, I will put for review some of the glance v2 API this week or > >> next at the most. Sorry for the delay here! :-) > >> > >> Just a question here, do you want to maintain the v1 classes and package > >> structure and create aside the v2 version or should I remove v1 > completely > >> and substitute it for the v2? Any guidelines to follow here? > >> > >> /Ignacio > >> On 14 Jan 2014 17:16, "Jeremy Daggett" <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> [redirecting response to [email protected]…] > >>> > >>> From: Jeremy <[email protected]<mailto: > >>> [email protected]>> > >>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" < > >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > >>> Date: Monday, January 13, 2014 at 10:23 AM > >>> To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" < > >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > >>> Subject: Re: Openstack glance - incubation > >>> > >>> Hi Avi, > >>> > >>> The Glance v1 API is essentially irrelevant at this point, which is why > >>> the code is still in incubation in “jclouds-labs-openstack". As soon as > >> the > >>> v2 API has been implemented and is promoted to the APIs in the jclouds > >>> proper repository (/apis) will it be considered “production” ready. > >>> > >>> The intent is that the v2 API will be supported going forward. We do > have > >>> a JIRA [1] for supporting this API, and there was a related discussion > >>> about this on the dev@ list [2] recently. > >>> > >>> HTH, and we welcome patches! ;) > >>> > >>> /jd > >>> > >>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-379 > >>> [2] http://markmail.org/message/sp6l72szns3nfe3s > >>> > >>> > >>> From: Avi Ben-Harush <[email protected]<mailto: > >>> [email protected]>> > >>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" < > >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > >>> Date: Monday, January 13, 2014 at 8:19 AM > >>> To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" < > >>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > >>> Subject: Openstack glance - incubation > >>> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I've noticed that glance is still in incubation, even though it's been > >>> there since nova. > >>> > >>> I expected that 1.7 release would include a "production" glance since > it > >>> is a basic functionality for any nova operation. > >>> > >>> why is glance still in incubation? > >>> when glance "production" is planned? > >>> > >>> Thanks > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Avi Ben-Harush > >>> > >> > >
