so any thoughts whether glance will enter 1.7 or not? or to be more specific how long until glance will be moved out of incubation and to what version?
:) On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Everett Toews <[email protected]>wrote: > +1 > > Please don't hold off on contributions just because it's in a "labs" repo. > We contribute a lot of code to jclouds-labs-openstack [1] too. And it's > just as easy to get the labs JARs from Maven as it is the main project JARs. > > A project getting contributions could be a start to it getting out of > labs. The other piece that really helps is having an abstraction for it in > the main jclouds project. > > Frankly, I wasn't aware of anyone using openstack-glance in > jclouds-labs-openstack. Knowing that you're using it makes a big > difference. Perhaps with your contributions we could say it's production > ready. > > Thanks, > Everett > > [1] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack > > > On Jan 14, 2014, at 12:03 PM, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > > > You can submit your contributions regardless of where the project is. We > > happily accept contributions in all repos! :) > > El 14/01/2014 19:00, "Inbar Stolberg" <[email protected]> escribió: > > > >> I agree with everet and i have a some contributions for v1 once it made > its > >> way to the main jclouds project... > >> On Jan 14, 2014 7:55 PM, "Everett Toews" <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> I don't think there's any harm in keeping the v1 API around, apart from > >>> the maintenance (of which there hasn't been any). > >>> > >>> The fact that the Image Service API v1 Reference is still linked to > from > >>> the OpenStack Docs [1] tells me that it's still in use and hasn't been > >>> deprecated. As such we should still support it. > >>> > >>> When there are two versions, we should probably default to v2 to > >> encourage > >>> the use of the newer API but still make it trivially easy to switch to > >> the > >>> v1 API. > >>> > >>> Everett > >>> > >>> [1] http://docs.openstack.org/ > >>> > >>> > >>> On Jan 14, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Jeremy Daggett wrote: > >>> > >>>> Hi Ignacio, > >>>> > >>>> This is great news on the Glance v2 API! > >>>> > >>>> My preference would be to completely remove the v1 API (since it was > >>> never > >>>> promoted from the labs project) and just move forward with v2. I can't > >>>> imagine that anyone is even using the v1 API at this point, but I > could > >>> be > >>>> wrong... > >>>> > >>>> If others on the list can provide additional perspective here, it > would > >>> be > >>>> greatly appreciated. Thx! > >>>> > >>>> /jd > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Ignacio Mulas Viela < > >>> [email protected] > >>>>> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> Hi all! > >>>>> Hopefully, I will put for review some of the glance v2 API this week > >> or > >>>>> next at the most. Sorry for the delay here! :-) > >>>>> > >>>>> Just a question here, do you want to maintain the v1 classes and > >> package > >>>>> structure and create aside the v2 version or should I remove v1 > >>> completely > >>>>> and substitute it for the v2? Any guidelines to follow here? > >>>>> > >>>>> /Ignacio > >>>>> On 14 Jan 2014 17:16, "Jeremy Daggett" <[email protected] > > > >>>>> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> [redirecting response to [email protected]…] > >>>>>> > >>>>>> From: Jeremy <[email protected]<mailto: > >>>>>> [email protected]>> > >>>>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > >> < > >>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>>> Date: Monday, January 13, 2014 at 10:23 AM > >>>>>> To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" < > >>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>>> Subject: Re: Openstack glance - incubation > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi Avi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The Glance v1 API is essentially irrelevant at this point, which is > >> why > >>>>>> the code is still in incubation in “jclouds-labs-openstack". As soon > >> as > >>>>> the > >>>>>> v2 API has been implemented and is promoted to the APIs in the > >> jclouds > >>>>>> proper repository (/apis) will it be considered “production” ready. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> The intent is that the v2 API will be supported going forward. We do > >>> have > >>>>>> a JIRA [1] for supporting this API, and there was a related > >> discussion > >>>>>> about this on the dev@ list [2] recently. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> HTH, and we welcome patches! ;) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> /jd > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-379 > >>>>>> [2] http://markmail.org/message/sp6l72szns3nfe3s > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> From: Avi Ben-Harush <[email protected]<mailto: > >>>>>> [email protected]>> > >>>>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" > >> < > >>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>>> Date: Monday, January 13, 2014 at 8:19 AM > >>>>>> To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" < > >>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> > >>>>>> Subject: Openstack glance - incubation > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hi, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I've noticed that glance is still in incubation, even though it's > >> been > >>>>>> there since nova. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I expected that 1.7 release would include a "production" glance > since > >>> it > >>>>>> is a basic functionality for any nova operation. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> why is glance still in incubation? > >>>>>> when glance "production" is planned? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> Avi Ben-Harush > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >
