+1 Please don't hold off on contributions just because it's in a "labs" repo. We contribute a lot of code to jclouds-labs-openstack [1] too. And it's just as easy to get the labs JARs from Maven as it is the main project JARs.
A project getting contributions could be a start to it getting out of labs. The other piece that really helps is having an abstraction for it in the main jclouds project. Frankly, I wasn't aware of anyone using openstack-glance in jclouds-labs-openstack. Knowing that you're using it makes a big difference. Perhaps with your contributions we could say it's production ready. Thanks, Everett [1] https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds-labs-openstack On Jan 14, 2014, at 12:03 PM, Ignasi Barrera wrote: > You can submit your contributions regardless of where the project is. We > happily accept contributions in all repos! :) > El 14/01/2014 19:00, "Inbar Stolberg" <[email protected]> escribió: > >> I agree with everet and i have a some contributions for v1 once it made its >> way to the main jclouds project... >> On Jan 14, 2014 7:55 PM, "Everett Toews" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I don't think there's any harm in keeping the v1 API around, apart from >>> the maintenance (of which there hasn't been any). >>> >>> The fact that the Image Service API v1 Reference is still linked to from >>> the OpenStack Docs [1] tells me that it's still in use and hasn't been >>> deprecated. As such we should still support it. >>> >>> When there are two versions, we should probably default to v2 to >> encourage >>> the use of the newer API but still make it trivially easy to switch to >> the >>> v1 API. >>> >>> Everett >>> >>> [1] http://docs.openstack.org/ >>> >>> >>> On Jan 14, 2014, at 11:28 AM, Jeremy Daggett wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Ignacio, >>>> >>>> This is great news on the Glance v2 API! >>>> >>>> My preference would be to completely remove the v1 API (since it was >>> never >>>> promoted from the labs project) and just move forward with v2. I can't >>>> imagine that anyone is even using the v1 API at this point, but I could >>> be >>>> wrong... >>>> >>>> If others on the list can provide additional perspective here, it would >>> be >>>> greatly appreciated. Thx! >>>> >>>> /jd >>>> >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 9:07 AM, Ignacio Mulas Viela < >>> [email protected] >>>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all! >>>>> Hopefully, I will put for review some of the glance v2 API this week >> or >>>>> next at the most. Sorry for the delay here! :-) >>>>> >>>>> Just a question here, do you want to maintain the v1 classes and >> package >>>>> structure and create aside the v2 version or should I remove v1 >>> completely >>>>> and substitute it for the v2? Any guidelines to follow here? >>>>> >>>>> /Ignacio >>>>> On 14 Jan 2014 17:16, "Jeremy Daggett" <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> [redirecting response to [email protected]…] >>>>>> >>>>>> From: Jeremy <[email protected]<mailto: >>>>>> [email protected]>> >>>>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" >> < >>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>>> Date: Monday, January 13, 2014 at 10:23 AM >>>>>> To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" < >>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>>> Subject: Re: Openstack glance - incubation >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Avi, >>>>>> >>>>>> The Glance v1 API is essentially irrelevant at this point, which is >> why >>>>>> the code is still in incubation in “jclouds-labs-openstack". As soon >> as >>>>> the >>>>>> v2 API has been implemented and is promoted to the APIs in the >> jclouds >>>>>> proper repository (/apis) will it be considered “production” ready. >>>>>> >>>>>> The intent is that the v2 API will be supported going forward. We do >>> have >>>>>> a JIRA [1] for supporting this API, and there was a related >> discussion >>>>>> about this on the dev@ list [2] recently. >>>>>> >>>>>> HTH, and we welcome patches! ;) >>>>>> >>>>>> /jd >>>>>> >>>>>> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JCLOUDS-379 >>>>>> [2] http://markmail.org/message/sp6l72szns3nfe3s >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> From: Avi Ben-Harush <[email protected]<mailto: >>>>>> [email protected]>> >>>>>> Reply-To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" >> < >>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>>> Date: Monday, January 13, 2014 at 8:19 AM >>>>>> To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" < >>>>>> [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> >>>>>> Subject: Openstack glance - incubation >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi, >>>>>> >>>>>> I've noticed that glance is still in incubation, even though it's >> been >>>>>> there since nova. >>>>>> >>>>>> I expected that 1.7 release would include a "production" glance since >>> it >>>>>> is a basic functionality for any nova operation. >>>>>> >>>>>> why is glance still in incubation? >>>>>> when glance "production" is planned? >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Avi Ben-Harush >>>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> >>
