I will but when people.a.o will be back. Why not using svnpubsub for vote ?
2013/6/3 Andrew Bayer <[email protected]>: > And FYI, I'd be very, very appreciative of any mentors who can review RC2 > and vote. > > And I'm +1 binding, PPMC. > > A. > > On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]>wrote: > >> My tendency in this direction was prompted by David and others pointing >> out that the release commit for RC0 wasn't actually pushed to the 1.6.x >> branch. That does seem like poor form, even though the tag was pushed. I'm >> definitely open to advice and suggestions on this - I've got experience >> with the release plugin, and I've got experience with iterating RCs for ASF >> votes, but I don't have experience meshing the two. =) >> >> A. >> >> >> >> On Jun 2, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Andrew Phillips <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >> Re the difference with the rc0 commit and now - experience. The revert >> commits are so I could run the release plugin again for the next RC, and I >> didn't do the reverts until I cut the RC. I'm still figuring out the best >> way to do RCs Apache-style combined with the Maven release plugin... >> > >> > Cool, thanks for the explanation. I'm assuming from that that you feel >> the "prepare-then-revert" style is preferred (vs. the >> "prepare-locally-and-dont-commit"). >> > >> > Fine with me, although I'd be interested to know what the thoughts are >> around having multiple commits between the "prepare" and the "revert", all >> of which have a "release" version in their POMs. >> > >> > @mentors: any guidance you can contribute here? >> > >> > Thanks! >> > >> > ap >> -- Olivier Lamy Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy
