On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm extending the vote another 24 hours for our mentors to respond. > > A. >
So realistically, and especially with the first one there isn't a practical point in an end date. It takes a significant chunk of time to audit a release, esp the first release, particularly a multi-artifact release like jclouds. I think we are getting close with -cli, but let me describe issues I've found with jclouds-cli LICENSE and LICENSE.txt exist in the root directory and are not the same document. The following files do not list that they are licensed to the ASF in the license headers, yet also don't have a NOTICE entry. If they are part of the SGA that Adrian executed, we should change the headers accordingly. If they are not - we need to annotate the NOTICE file with the copyright holders copyright notice and claim. ./assembly/pom.xml:~ Copyright (C) 2012, the original authors ./assembly/src/main/assembly/win.xml: ~ Copyright (C) 2012, the original authors ./assembly/src/main/assembly/unix.xml: ~ Copyright (C) 2012, the original authors ./assembly/src/main/filtered-resources/etc/startup.properties:# Copyright (C) 2012, the original authors ./assembly/src/main/filtered-resources/etc/custom.properties:# Copyright (C) 2012, the original authors ./branding/pom.xml:~ Copyright (C) 2012, the original authors ./pom.xml:~ Copyright (C) 2012, the original authors ./runner/pom.xml:~ Copyright (C) 2012, the original authors ./runner/src/main/java/org/jclouds/cli/runner/Main.java: * Copyright (C) 2012, the original authors I don't see any other problems on -cli at present, but other mentors may find additional problems. I'll try and start working through the others tomorrow. --David
