Performed the following tests: * Build jclouds, jclouds-labs and jclouds-chef tags and all builds succeeded (the build included RAT plugin execution and everything is ok too)
* Run the live tests for Chef and Hosted Chef. All passing except two in HostedChef: one due to a timeout, and the other one because of a known issue in HostedChef, so everything is OK in our side. * Downloaded the dependencies from the staging repos and tested the integration with the ComputeService with jclouds-examples, chef-solo, Abiquo and EC2, and everything is OK. Also verified the signatures of the chef artifacts in the repo with Andrew's key in the jclouds KEYS file and they are OK. +1 binding, PPMC. On 3 June 2013 17:13, Andrew Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: > 'cos I didn't know that was an option? =) > > people.a.o is back, fwiw. > > A. > > On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 4:46 AM, Olivier Lamy <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I will but when people.a.o will be back. >> Why not using svnpubsub for vote ? >> >> 2013/6/3 Andrew Bayer <[email protected]>: >> > And FYI, I'd be very, very appreciative of any mentors who can review RC2 >> > and vote. >> > >> > And I'm +1 binding, PPMC. >> > >> > A. >> > >> > On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 11:03 AM, Andrew Bayer <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> > >> >> My tendency in this direction was prompted by David and others pointing >> >> out that the release commit for RC0 wasn't actually pushed to the 1.6.x >> >> branch. That does seem like poor form, even though the tag was pushed. >> I'm >> >> definitely open to advice and suggestions on this - I've got experience >> >> with the release plugin, and I've got experience with iterating RCs for >> ASF >> >> votes, but I don't have experience meshing the two. =) >> >> >> >> A. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> On Jun 2, 2013, at 10:55 AM, Andrew Phillips <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> Re the difference with the rc0 commit and now - experience. The >> revert >> >> commits are so I could run the release plugin again for the next RC, >> and I >> >> didn't do the reverts until I cut the RC. I'm still figuring out the >> best >> >> way to do RCs Apache-style combined with the Maven release plugin... >> >> > >> >> > Cool, thanks for the explanation. I'm assuming from that that you feel >> >> the "prepare-then-revert" style is preferred (vs. the >> >> "prepare-locally-and-dont-commit"). >> >> > >> >> > Fine with me, although I'd be interested to know what the thoughts are >> >> around having multiple commits between the "prepare" and the "revert", >> all >> >> of which have a "release" version in their POMs. >> >> > >> >> > @mentors: any guidance you can contribute here? >> >> > >> >> > Thanks! >> >> > >> >> > ap >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Olivier Lamy >> Ecetera: http://ecetera.com.au >> http://twitter.com/olamy | http://linkedin.com/in/olamy >>
