Hey, Flo. https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/tree/master/drivers/joda
if you have strong feelings about joda, use ^^ The mess of a pull request you proposed adds more untested code in a way that affects *all* 40+ providers. Rather than lecture about reinventing wheel, why not scope the change properly or move to joda. On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Florian Leibert <[email protected]>wrote: > AWS has rolled out different versions but JClouds needs to be agnostic to > that as it's a valid expression. Either way - the parser is not > implemented > correctly as it actually doesn't parse any valid iso8601 expression. We > shouldn't have to reinvent the wheel here as others have already figured > out how to *correctly* parse iso8601 expressions (see JodaTime). > > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2013 at 12:49 PM, Adrian Cole <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > Typically an api only returns second or millis format, not both. In the > > past, we've setup a fallback when the more popular one fails. This would > be > > in place where clones exist more often. > > > > — > > Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub< > https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/105#issuecomment-22520097> > > . > > > > > > -- > > --------------------------------------- > t: http://twitter.com/flo > s: florianleibert > l: http://www.linkedin.com/in/florianleibert/ > --------------------------------------- > > — > Reply to this email directly or view it on > GitHub<https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/105#issuecomment-22587219> > . > --- Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/jclouds/jclouds/pull/105#issuecomment-22587953
