Maybe not, but that'd mean all the PPMC and mentors voting. =) A.
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 3:43 PM, Everett Toews <[email protected]>wrote: > If we wind up with a 100% vote do we need to wait the 72 hours? > > Everett > > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew Bayer [[email protected]] > Received: Tuesday, 17 Sep 2013, 3:38PM > To: [email protected] [[email protected]] > Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Graduate! > > Alright then, formal vote thread incoming in a bit! > > A. > > > On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 12:06 PM, Everett Toews < > [email protected] > > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Thanks for starting this abayer. > > > > Cheers, > > Everett > > > > On Sep 16, 2013, at 1:48 PM, Andrew Bayer wrote: > > > > > Ok, so I think we've done everything we need to do, so I'm proposing we > > > graduate. I've got a draft for the charter we'd submit to the IPMC and > > then > > > the board at https://wiki.apache.org/jclouds/GraduationCharter - note > > that > > > I did put myself down as VP, but would be perfectly fine with someone > > else > > > taking it. I'm just kinda there by default. > > > > > > For the initial members, well, I'm assuming that translates directly to > > PMC > > > - so I didn't include Zach there. I imagine we might have to do a > little > > > juryrigging of commit rights after the graduation finishes, but I > didn't > > > want to blur lines. > > > > > > I did include only one of the mentors on the top-level PMC, David > Nalley. > > > If any other mentors would like to be on the PMC, just add your names > > there > > > - I didn't want to make any presumptions of who wanted in/who didn't, > and > > > have always found the "mentors end up as top-level PMC by default" > thing > > a > > > bit silly. =) > > > > > > I also included all the initial committers/PPMC members on the > top-level > > > PMC, including those who haven't been active for a while - again, if > > anyone > > > would like to be removed from that list, just ask. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > A. > > > > >
