> does everything work on OS X? It works on OS X 10.7.4 with Java 1.7.0_05.
Laurent On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 > (one comment, not blocking) > > Andy > > > Tested on Ubuntu 12.04, java 7 unless otherwise stated. > > > does everything work on MS Windows? > Yes (I had to special boot windows for this!) > Windows 7 / 64 bit. > Downloaded apache-jena and jena-fuseki > Ran Fuseki, with TDB database; also accessed same database form command line > after. > > > does everything work on OS X? > No idea > > > is the GPG signature fine? > Yes > (and MD5 and SHA1) > > > is there a source archive? > Yes > > can the source archive really be built? > Yes > "mvn clean test" works > > > is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact > (both source and binary artifacts)? > Yes > > > does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > Yes > > > if there is a tag in the SCM, does it contain reproducible sources? > > Yes but it's "2.7.3-RC3", not "jena-2.7.3" [*] > > (I directly set the tag to "version" for the last two builds so that POMs > gets right version, not the RC). > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/2.7.3-RC3/ > > Let's move it to jena-2.7.3 after release (incubator style). > > Also: > > bin/tdbquery --version > Jena: VERSION: 2.7.3 > Jena: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 > ARQ: VERSION: 2.9.3 > ARQ: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 > TDB: VERSION: 0.9.3 > TDB: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 > > ./fuseki-server --version > Jena: VERSION: 2.7.3 > Jena: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 > ARQ: VERSION: 2.9.3 > ARQ: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 > TDB: VERSION: 0.9.3 > TDB: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 > Fuseki: VERSION: 0.2.4 > Fuseki: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 > > > On 03/08/12 23:19, Rob Vesse wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> >> Rob >> >> On 8/3/12 12:39 PM, "Rob Vesse" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Here is a vote on a release build for Jena 2.7.3. >>> >>> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. >>> (We do need at least 3 PMC +1's but the more it's tested, the better.) >>> >>> This is a distribution of Jena (IRI, core, ARQ, TDB) and also of Fuseki. >>> The external dependencies are the same as for Jena 2.7.3. >>> >>> Versions: >>> >>> jena-parent 3 >>> jena-iri 0.9.3 >>> jena-core 2.7.3 >>> jena-arq 2.9.3 >>> jena-tdb 0.9.3 >>> apache-jena 2.7.3 (the combined distribution) >>> >>> jena-fuseki 0.2.4 (separate binary) >>> >>> Staging repository: >>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-119/<http >>> s://repository.apache.org/ent/repositories/orgapachejena-285/> >>> >>> Proposed dist/ area: >>> >>> http://people.apache.org/~rvesse/Jena-2.7.3-RC3/<http://people.apache.org/ >>> ~andy/Jena-2.7.2/dist/> >>> >>> Keys: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS >>> >>> SVN tag: >>> >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/2.7.3-RC3/<https://svn.apache.or >>> g/repos/asf/jena/tags/jena-2.7.2/> >>> >>> NB. This picks up jena-sdb and jena-larq as well. The source-release >>> does not; jena-sdb and jena-larq are not included in the build. >>> >>> >>> Please vote to approve this release: >>> >>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>> [ ] 0 Don't care >>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... >>> >>> This vote will be open to the end of >>> >>> Monday, 6th August, 23:59 UTC >>> >>> (72 hours from the same hour tonight UTC). >>> >>> Rob >>> >>> >>> Checking needed: >>> >>> does everything work on MS Windows? >>> does everything work on OS X? >>> is the GPG signature fine? >>> is there a source archive? >>> can the source archive really be built? >>> is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact >>> (both source and binary artifacts)? >>> does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? >>> if there is a tag in the SCM, does it contain reproducible sources? >> >> >
