I have svn moved the tag to Jena-2.7.3 Rob
On 8/6/12 9:46 AM, "Rob Vesse" <[email protected]> wrote: >Sorry I wasn't sure if I was supposed to tag it when it was a release >candidate, if it should just be the intended release version then that >should be noted in the Release Process documentation for future reference > > >But yes we can svn move it to Jena-2.7.3 as and when the release vote >passes > >Rob > >On 8/4/12 11:54 AM, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>+1 >>(one comment, not blocking) >> >> Andy >> >> >>Tested on Ubuntu 12.04, java 7 unless otherwise stated. >> >> does everything work on MS Windows? >>Yes (I had to special boot windows for this!) >>Windows 7 / 64 bit. >>Downloaded apache-jena and jena-fuseki >>Ran Fuseki, with TDB database; also accessed same database form command >>line after. >> >> does everything work on OS X? >>No idea >> >> is the GPG signature fine? >>Yes >>(and MD5 and SHA1) >> >> is there a source archive? >>Yes >> can the source archive really be built? >>Yes >>"mvn clean test" works >> >> is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact >> (both source and binary artifacts)? >>Yes >> >> does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? >>Yes >> >> if there is a tag in the SCM, does it contain reproducible >>sources? >> >>Yes but it's "2.7.3-RC3", not "jena-2.7.3" [*] >> >>(I directly set the tag to "version" for the last two builds so that >>POMs gets right version, not the RC). >> >>https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/2.7.3-RC3/ >> >>Let's move it to jena-2.7.3 after release (incubator style). >> >>Also: >> >>bin/tdbquery --version >>Jena: VERSION: 2.7.3 >>Jena: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 >>ARQ: VERSION: 2.9.3 >>ARQ: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 >>TDB: VERSION: 0.9.3 >>TDB: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 >> >>./fuseki-server --version >>Jena: VERSION: 2.7.3 >>Jena: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 >>ARQ: VERSION: 2.9.3 >>ARQ: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 >>TDB: VERSION: 0.9.3 >>TDB: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 >>Fuseki: VERSION: 0.2.4 >>Fuseki: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 >> >>On 03/08/12 23:19, Rob Vesse wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> Rob >>> >>> On 8/3/12 12:39 PM, "Rob Vesse" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Here is a vote on a release build for Jena 2.7.3. >>>> >>>> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. >>>> (We do need at least 3 PMC +1's but the more it's tested, the better.) >>>> >>>> This is a distribution of Jena (IRI, core, ARQ, TDB) and also of >>>>Fuseki. >>>> The external dependencies are the same as for Jena 2.7.3. >>>> >>>> Versions: >>>> >>>> jena-parent 3 >>>> jena-iri 0.9.3 >>>> jena-core 2.7.3 >>>> jena-arq 2.9.3 >>>> jena-tdb 0.9.3 >>>> apache-jena 2.7.3 (the combined distribution) >>>> >>>> jena-fuseki 0.2.4 (separate binary) >>>> >>>> Staging repository: >>>> >>>>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-119/<h >>>>t >>>>tp >>>> s://repository.apache.org/ent/repositories/orgapachejena-285/> >>>> >>>> Proposed dist/ area: >>>> >>>>http://people.apache.org/~rvesse/Jena-2.7.3-RC3/<http://people.apache.o >>>>r >>>>g/ >>>> ~andy/Jena-2.7.2/dist/> >>>> >>>> Keys: >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS >>>> >>>> SVN tag: >>>> >>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/2.7.3-RC3/<https://svn.apache >>>>. >>>>or >>>> g/repos/asf/jena/tags/jena-2.7.2/> >>>> >>>> NB. This picks up jena-sdb and jena-larq as well. The source-release >>>> does not; jena-sdb and jena-larq are not included in the build. >>>> >>>> >>>> Please vote to approve this release: >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>>> [ ] 0 Don't care >>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... >>>> >>>> This vote will be open to the end of >>>> >>>> Monday, 6th August, 23:59 UTC >>>> >>>> (72 hours from the same hour tonight UTC). >>>> >>>> Rob >>>> >>>> >>>> Checking needed: >>>> >>>> does everything work on MS Windows? >>>> does everything work on OS X? >>>> is the GPG signature fine? >>>> is there a source archive? >>>> can the source archive really be built? >>>> is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact >>>> (both source and binary artifacts)? >>>> does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? >>>> if there is a tag in the SCM, does it contain reproducible >>>>sources? >>> >> >
