Thanks Laurent, I should probably have noted in my vote that my dev environment is OS X so yes it does work on OS X as you noted
I will assume your vote is a +1 We still need one more +1 from an IPMC member in order to release If any of you have time to review the release candidate in the next day or so that'd be great though I appreciate it is the summer and people may well be on holiday. Thanks, Rob On 8/6/12 12:03 PM, "Laurent Pellegrino" <[email protected]> wrote: >> does everything work on OS X? > >It works on OS X 10.7.4 with Java 1.7.0_05. > >Laurent > >On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 8:54 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >> +1 >> (one comment, not blocking) >> >> Andy >> >> >> Tested on Ubuntu 12.04, java 7 unless otherwise stated. >> >> >> does everything work on MS Windows? >> Yes (I had to special boot windows for this!) >> Windows 7 / 64 bit. >> Downloaded apache-jena and jena-fuseki >> Ran Fuseki, with TDB database; also accessed same database form command >>line >> after. >> >> >> does everything work on OS X? >> No idea >> >> >> is the GPG signature fine? >> Yes >> (and MD5 and SHA1) >> >> >> is there a source archive? >> Yes >> >> can the source archive really be built? >> Yes >> "mvn clean test" works >> >> >> is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact >> (both source and binary artifacts)? >> Yes >> >> >> does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? >> Yes >> >> >> if there is a tag in the SCM, does it contain reproducible >>sources? >> >> Yes but it's "2.7.3-RC3", not "jena-2.7.3" [*] >> >> (I directly set the tag to "version" for the last two builds so that >>POMs >> gets right version, not the RC). >> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/2.7.3-RC3/ >> >> Let's move it to jena-2.7.3 after release (incubator style). >> >> Also: >> >> bin/tdbquery --version >> Jena: VERSION: 2.7.3 >> Jena: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 >> ARQ: VERSION: 2.9.3 >> ARQ: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 >> TDB: VERSION: 0.9.3 >> TDB: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 >> >> ./fuseki-server --version >> Jena: VERSION: 2.7.3 >> Jena: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 >> ARQ: VERSION: 2.9.3 >> ARQ: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 >> TDB: VERSION: 0.9.3 >> TDB: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 >> Fuseki: VERSION: 0.2.4 >> Fuseki: BUILD_DATE: 2012-08-03T11:40:41-0700 >> >> >> On 03/08/12 23:19, Rob Vesse wrote: >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> >>> Rob >>> >>> On 8/3/12 12:39 PM, "Rob Vesse" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Here is a vote on a release build for Jena 2.7.3. >>>> >>>> Everyone, not just committers, is invited to test and vote. >>>> (We do need at least 3 PMC +1's but the more it's tested, the better.) >>>> >>>> This is a distribution of Jena (IRI, core, ARQ, TDB) and also of >>>>Fuseki. >>>> The external dependencies are the same as for Jena 2.7.3. >>>> >>>> Versions: >>>> >>>> jena-parent 3 >>>> jena-iri 0.9.3 >>>> jena-core 2.7.3 >>>> jena-arq 2.9.3 >>>> jena-tdb 0.9.3 >>>> apache-jena 2.7.3 (the combined distribution) >>>> >>>> jena-fuseki 0.2.4 (separate binary) >>>> >>>> Staging repository: >>>> >>>> >>>>https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-119/<h >>>>ttp >>>> s://repository.apache.org/ent/repositories/orgapachejena-285/> >>>> >>>> Proposed dist/ area: >>>> >>>> >>>>http://people.apache.org/~rvesse/Jena-2.7.3-RC3/<http://people.apache.o >>>>rg/ >>>> ~andy/Jena-2.7.2/dist/> >>>> >>>> Keys: >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS >>>> >>>> SVN tag: >>>> >>>> >>>>http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/2.7.3-RC3/<https://svn.apache >>>>.or >>>> g/repos/asf/jena/tags/jena-2.7.2/> >>>> >>>> NB. This picks up jena-sdb and jena-larq as well. The source-release >>>> does not; jena-sdb and jena-larq are not included in the build. >>>> >>>> >>>> Please vote to approve this release: >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 Approve the release >>>> [ ] 0 Don't care >>>> [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... >>>> >>>> This vote will be open to the end of >>>> >>>> Monday, 6th August, 23:59 UTC >>>> >>>> (72 hours from the same hour tonight UTC). >>>> >>>> Rob >>>> >>>> >>>> Checking needed: >>>> >>>> does everything work on MS Windows? >>>> does everything work on OS X? >>>> is the GPG signature fine? >>>> is there a source archive? >>>> can the source archive really be built? >>>> is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact >>>> (both source and binary artifacts)? >>>> does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? >>>> if there is a tag in the SCM, does it contain reproducible >>>>sources? >>> >>> >>
