[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-241?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13733221#comment-13733221
]
Fergal Monaghan commented on JENA-241:
--------------------------------------
Thanks for that clarification Rob, I will finalise the choice of route with SAP
and submit asap.
As for updating the documentation: I cannot find anywhere that is out of date
(i.e. mentioning the tick box). I think I simply recalled attempting to submit
last year and there was a tick box: Andy last year had also mentioned making a
declaration at upload time, and I put 2 and 2 together and called this the
"tick box". So as far as I'm concerned you are up to date, I was the one who
needed updating :)
> Add support for SAP database
> ----------------------------
>
> Key: JENA-241
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-241
> Project: Apache Jena
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: SDB
> Affects Versions: SDB 1.3.5
> Reporter: Fergal Monaghan
> Original Estimate: 48h
> Remaining Estimate: 48h
>
> I would like to contribute my complete and tested patch to make SDB
> compatible with SAP's new in-memory, column-store (-possible) database
> codenamed HANA. I followed the instructions here [1] to the letter, created
> the patch and tested by applying it cleanly. Now I can run SPARQL endpoints
> on top of SAP's DB, and I'd like everyone else to be able to do this too. I
> just need to check with SAP legal before I attach the patch to this issue as
> described at [1]. Keep up the good work guys!
> [1] http://incubator.apache.org/jena/getting_involved/index.html
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
