My vote is [0] - I wouldn't want to hold up the release but there is an
unresolved ticket with regards to the bulk update handler from our
perspective. We will need to patch our copy of Jena so that it still
uses the BulkUpdateHandler instead of the GraphUtil methods, because
otherwise SDB performance will suffer which would badly impact our
customer's experience.
Holger
On 9/12/2013 23:36, Andy Seaborne wrote:
Hi,
Here is a vote on a release build for Jena 2.11.0
Everyone, not just committers and PMC members, is invited to test and
vote. (We do need at least 3 PMC +1's.)
Versions:
apache-jena 2.11.0 (the combined distribution)
apache-jena-libs 2.11.0 (the maven artifact for the core libraries)
jena-fuseki 1.0.0 (separate binary)
including the first releases of:
jena-text 1.0.0
jena-spatial 1.0.1
jena-security 2.11.0
jena-jdbc 1.0.0
Staging repository:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-035/
Proposed dist/ area:
http://people.apache.org/~andy/jena-2.11.0-RC/
Keys:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS
SVN tag:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/jena-2.11.0/
Please vote to approve this release:
[ ] +1 Approve the release
[ ] 0 Don't care
[ ] -1 Don't release, because ...
This vote will be open to the end of
Monday 16/September at 23:59 UTC
(96 hours from the same hour tonight UTC).
Andy
Checking needed:
is the GPG signature fine?
is there a source archive?
can the source archive really be built?
is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact
(both source and binary artifacts)?
does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions?
check the dependencies.
do all the tests work?
if there is a tag in the SCM, does it contain reproducible sources?
