Sorry, our movers are packing up our possessions for shipping back to the UK as I write this and the week doesn't get any less hectic from hear on in so I will not have chance to review the release formally.
Apologies, Rob On 9/17/13 8:06 AM, "Ian Dickinson" <[email protected]> wrote: >On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Ian Dickinson <[email protected]> >wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Ping. >>> >>> We need another PMC +1 >>> >>> (if you can't find the time just at the moment, a note that you will be >>> submitting a vote sometime would help) >> I'll try to do check this afternoon. > >+1, with minor concerns > >Tagged source builds OK (eventually!). MD5 checksums OK. Tests pass. >Licenses look fine to me (didn't look that closely, since afaik >nothing has changed in the IP). GPG verifies. > >I did notice that there are no changes for 2.11.0 listed in >ReleaseNotes-{TDB,Jena}.txt, only ReleaseNotes-ARQ.txt lists any >changes. Hope that's OK - I've kind of lost track of which bits are >changing where. > >For Fuseki, the ReleaseNotes.txt don't have a 1.0.0 section, empty or >otherwise. > >Ian
