+1
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 2:36 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Here is a vote on a release build for Jena 2.11.0 > > Everyone, not just committers and PMC members, is invited to test and > vote. (We do need at least 3 PMC +1's.) > > Versions: > > apache-jena 2.11.0 (the combined distribution) > apache-jena-libs 2.11.0 (the maven artifact for the core libraries) > jena-fuseki 1.0.0 (separate binary) > > including the first releases of: > > jena-text 1.0.0 > jena-spatial 1.0.1 > jena-security 2.11.0 > jena-jdbc 1.0.0 > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/**content/repositories/**orgapachejena-035/<https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachejena-035/> > > Proposed dist/ area: > http://people.apache.org/~**andy/jena-2.11.0-RC/<http://people.apache.org/~andy/jena-2.11.0-RC/> > > Keys: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/jena/dist/KEYS<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/dist/KEYS> > > SVN tag: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/jena/tags/jena-2.11.0/<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/jena/tags/jena-2.11.0/> > > Please vote to approve this release: > > [ ] +1 Approve the release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Don't release, because ... > > This vote will be open to the end of > > Monday 16/September at 23:59 UTC > (96 hours from the same hour tonight UTC). > > Andy > > > Checking needed: > > is the GPG signature fine? > is there a source archive? > can the source archive really be built? > is there a correct LICENSE and NOTICE file in each artifact > (both source and binary artifacts)? > does the NOTICE file contain all necessary attributions? > check the dependencies. > do all the tests work? > if there is a tag in the SCM, does it contain reproducible sources? > -- I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the web<http://like-like.xenei.com> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren
