fwiw, if someone is going to update Eyeball, doing so wrt to what's been going on in RDF validation [1] might make sense.
Cheers, Mike [1] http://www.w3.org/2012/12/rdf-val/ On Tue, Oct 22, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Chris Dollin <chris.dol...@epimorphics.com>wrote: > On Tuesday, October 22, 2013 11:13:52 AM Phil Coates wrote: > > > Is anyone actively working on Eyeball at the moment? > > I'm [1] not actively working on it at the moment, partly because > I'd like other people involved ... > > > We're developing some applications where we'd love to use it for > validation > > of ontologies and for checking uploaded RDF against these ontologies > > (amongst other things, e.g. SPARQL-based inspection) > > > > If we use it, it would be handy if it was in a Maven-friendly format; if > > no-one is currently doing any active development of the project, would > > anyone have any objections to me Mavenizing it? > > I think that would be splendid and I'm willing to help where I can. > Naturally I have Opinions. > > > Could it then be moved over to Apache with the rest of Jena? > > That would take a vote, I believe. There needs to be some assurance > of long-term support, a I understand it (which seems reasonable to me). > > Chris > > [1] I'm the originator of Eyeball. > > -- > "It does not need to take events in their correct order." > /Hexwood/ > > Epimorphics Ltd, http://www.epimorphics.com > Registered address: Court Lodge, 105 High Street, Portishead, Bristol BS20 > 6PT > Epimorphics Ltd. is a limited company registered in England (number > 7016688) > >
