Ok, I will plan to cut the release candidate on Monday Rob
On 30/05/2014 10:58, "Andy Seaborne" <[email protected]> wrote: >One thought to make the release reviewing easier ... > >If the vote message has a list of dependency changes (inc version) from >the last release, then often that's no change or minor version updates. > Knowing where the changes would make checking easier. It should be as >easy as diff'ing jena-parent pom or two runs of mvn dependency:??? > > Andy > >On 29/05/14 15:20, Rob Vesse wrote: >> +1 >> >> I don't have any issues assigned to me that need to get into 2.11.2 nor >>am >> I aware of any blockers other than the JENA-705 sequence bug Andy is >> looking at >> >> Who wants to be RM for the release? I am happy to volunteer if no-one >> else has a strong desire to run this release >> >> Rob >> >> On 29/05/2014 14:05, "Claude Warren" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Sounds like a plan to me >>> >>> >>> On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Are we ready for a Jena 2.11.2 release, the last Java6 release? >>>> >>>> I know of JENA-705 which needs at least investigating. >>>> >>>> Outline: >>>> >>>> * release Jena 2.11.2 >>>> >>>> * throw the big java6/7 switch >>>> - do some clearing up (small scale stuff, warnings etc) >>>> >>>> * Final RDF 1.1 isms. >>>> >>>> * wait (about a month?) to see if anything nasty crawls out >>>> >>>> * release Jena 2.12.0 >>>> >>>> Sound like a plan? >>>> >>>> Andy >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the >>> web<http://like-like.xenei.com> >>> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren >> >> >> >> >
