On 30/05/14 10:53, Andy Seaborne wrote:
JENA-705 is solved (yipee! - completely different issue to what I
expected!)

There /may/ be a slight performance regression on memory models - I only
noticed because I was repeated running code and the timing had
stabilised so smaller difference in figures were noticable.

If there is, it's in memory models only.  I'll investigate.

Regression de-regressed. It was a April change and some debug setting had got into the code base. My bad.

        Andy


As it stands at the moment I don't think it's a  a blocker because I
couldn't write a JIRA as to what's happening.

Of course, as soon as a release is done X zillion emails will turn up
with real facts :-)

     Andy



On 29/05/14 15:20, Rob Vesse wrote:
+1

I don't have any issues assigned to me that need to get into 2.11.2
nor am
I aware of any blockers other than the JENA-705 sequence bug Andy is
looking at

Who wants to be RM for the release?  I am happy to volunteer if no-one
else has a strong desire to run this release

Rob

On 29/05/2014 14:05, "Claude Warren" <[email protected]> wrote:

Sounds like a plan to me


On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Andy Seaborne <[email protected]> wrote:

Are we ready for a Jena 2.11.2 release, the last Java6 release?

I know of JENA-705 which needs at least investigating.

Outline:

* release Jena 2.11.2

* throw the big java6/7 switch
      - do some clearing up (small scale stuff, warnings etc)

* Final RDF 1.1 isms.

* wait (about a month?) to see if anything nasty crawls out

* release Jena 2.12.0

Sound like a plan?

         Andy




--
I like: Like Like - The likeliest place on the
web<http://like-like.xenei.com>
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/claudewarren






Reply via email to