Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/151
Holy moly, @afs , thanks for the huge assist! I was out yesterday (Yom
Kippur) and am now catching up. I will leave comments specific to the HTTP
question on the new PR, but I will try to speak to the other points here.
1. I am certainly happy to see a spurious plugin go. I have no problem with
including that change in this package of changes, if that's okay with everyone
else. Or it could be a quick separate ticket/commit, to keep thing straighter
in the history.
2. I have no idea why `maven-source-plugin ` is overridden. Baggage from
long-ago when this material was imported into the main code base?
3. I haven't seen AspectJ used anywhere, but I haven't been all through the
`jdbc` code. Same as the first point-- I have no problem removing it here or
elsewhere.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
