Hello, Web seems ambiguous to me For example, websocket is/will be web but Proxy cannot record it. How about: HTTP(S) Scenario Recorder or HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder.
Regards Philippe On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote: > > Le 11/09/2013 10:42, sebb a ecrit : > > On 11 September 2013 09:28, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> I've prefer keep the word "proxy" in the name. >>> >> That's the part I really want to get rid of, because of the potential >> confusion with the other proxy settings. >> > Ok. > (The word "proxy" means in my mind: "you must configure your browser to > use this (JMeter) proxy to record your script".) > > > > >> "Test" is an ambiguous word, means in my mind "test" (like beta-test). >>> Word >>> like "script" seems better. >>> >> Well, we use Test already quite a lot, as in Test Element / Test Script. >> >> Since JMeter is all about testing, I think using Test is OK. >> >> - HTTP(S) Proxy Recorder >>> - HTTP(S) Proxy Test Recorder >>> - Web Proxy Recorder >>> - Web Proxy for Test Recorder >>> - Web Proxy for Script Recorder >>> - Web Proxy Script Recorder >>> >>> >>> Web Proxy Recorder is my favorite. >>> >>> How about >> >> Web Test Script Recorder >> > > +1 to this. > > > > or >> Test Script Recorder - HTTP(S) >> or >> HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder >> >> Le 11/09/2013 09:00, Philippe Mouawad a ecrit : >>> >>> HTTP(S) Test Recorder would be a good name I think. >>>> But if we do the change we absolutely need to keep all references to >>>> JMeter >>>> Proxy Server as it is referenced on many links and documentations. >>>> >>>> Did you have some time to think about summariser enabling ? >>>> >>>> Great changes you made sebb ! >>>> >>>> Thanks >>>> >>>> On Tuesday, September 10, 2013, sebb wrote: >>>> >>>> The HTTP Proxy Server test element is used to record browser sessions >>>>> as test plans. >>>>> >>>>> The name does not describe its function (it describes the >>>>> implementation). >>>>> Having Proxy in the name means it's more easily confused with the >>>>> proxy settings that may be needed to run tests. >>>>> >>>>> I wonder if it would be a good idea to rename the test element to >>>>> something like >>>>> >>>>> HTTP(S) Test Recorder >>>>> or >>>>> Test Recorder - HTTP(S) >>>>> or >>>>> Test Recorder - HTTP/HTTPS >>>>> >>>>> I did consider "Test Recorder" on its own, but that might be taken to >>>>> imply that it can record other test types (e.g. JDBC), which it cannot >>>>> at present. Even if we did implement JDBC recording, it would likely >>>>> need a different GUI as the options would be completely different, so >>>>> I think the name needs to include HTTP(S). >>>>> >>>>> I think the rename will only affect the component reference docs - and >>>>> we can add an anchor for the old name. >>>>> >>>>> Thoughts? >>>>> Would it help to rename the element? >>>>> >>>>> If there is agreement, I'd like to do this before the next release. >>>>> There are other major changes to the recorder which also need >>>>> documenting. >>>>> >>>>> > -- Cordialement. Philippe Mouawad.
