On 12.09.2013 20:38, sebb wrote: > Would everyone be happy with the following? > > HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder
OK > On 11 September 2013 12:58, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> > wrote: >> Hello, >> Web seems ambiguous to me >> >> For example, websocket is/will be web but Proxy cannot record it. >> How about: >> HTTP(S) Scenario Recorder or HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder. >> >> >> Regards >> Philippe >> >> >> >> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> >>> Le 11/09/2013 10:42, sebb a ecrit : >>> >>> On 11 September 2013 09:28, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I've prefer keep the word "proxy" in the name. >>>>> >>>> That's the part I really want to get rid of, because of the potential >>>> confusion with the other proxy settings. >>>> >>> Ok. >>> (The word "proxy" means in my mind: "you must configure your browser to >>> use this (JMeter) proxy to record your script".) >>> >>> >>> >>> >>>> "Test" is an ambiguous word, means in my mind "test" (like beta-test). >>>>> Word >>>>> like "script" seems better. >>>>> >>>> Well, we use Test already quite a lot, as in Test Element / Test Script. >>>> >>>> Since JMeter is all about testing, I think using Test is OK. >>>> >>>> - HTTP(S) Proxy Recorder >>>>> - HTTP(S) Proxy Test Recorder >>>>> - Web Proxy Recorder >>>>> - Web Proxy for Test Recorder >>>>> - Web Proxy for Script Recorder >>>>> - Web Proxy Script Recorder >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Web Proxy Recorder is my favorite. >>>>> >>>>> How about >>>> >>>> Web Test Script Recorder >>>> >>> >>> +1 to this. >>> >>> >>> >>> or >>>> Test Script Recorder - HTTP(S) >>>> or >>>> HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder >>>> >>>> Le 11/09/2013 09:00, Philippe Mouawad a ecrit : >>>>> >>>>> HTTP(S) Test Recorder would be a good name I think. >>>>>> But if we do the change we absolutely need to keep all references to >>>>>> JMeter >>>>>> Proxy Server as it is referenced on many links and documentations. >>>>>> >>>>>> Did you have some time to think about summariser enabling ? >>>>>> >>>>>> Great changes you made sebb ! >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tuesday, September 10, 2013, sebb wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> The HTTP Proxy Server test element is used to record browser sessions >>>>>>> as test plans. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The name does not describe its function (it describes the >>>>>>> implementation). >>>>>>> Having Proxy in the name means it's more easily confused with the >>>>>>> proxy settings that may be needed to run tests. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I wonder if it would be a good idea to rename the test element to >>>>>>> something like >>>>>>> >>>>>>> HTTP(S) Test Recorder >>>>>>> or >>>>>>> Test Recorder - HTTP(S) >>>>>>> or >>>>>>> Test Recorder - HTTP/HTTPS >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I did consider "Test Recorder" on its own, but that might be taken to >>>>>>> imply that it can record other test types (e.g. JDBC), which it cannot >>>>>>> at present. Even if we did implement JDBC recording, it would likely >>>>>>> need a different GUI as the options would be completely different, so >>>>>>> I think the name needs to include HTTP(S). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I think the rename will only affect the component reference docs - and >>>>>>> we can add an anchor for the old name. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>>> Would it help to rename the element? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> If there is agreement, I'd like to do this before the next release. >>>>>>> There are other major changes to the recorder which also need >>>>>>> documenting. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Cordialement. >> Philippe Mouawad.
