Would everyone be happy with the following? HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder
On 11 September 2013 12:58, Philippe Mouawad <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > Web seems ambiguous to me > > For example, websocket is/will be web but Proxy cannot record it. > How about: > HTTP(S) Scenario Recorder or HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder. > > > Regards > Philippe > > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> Le 11/09/2013 10:42, sebb a ecrit : >> >> On 11 September 2013 09:28, Milamber <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> I've prefer keep the word "proxy" in the name. >>>> >>> That's the part I really want to get rid of, because of the potential >>> confusion with the other proxy settings. >>> >> Ok. >> (The word "proxy" means in my mind: "you must configure your browser to >> use this (JMeter) proxy to record your script".) >> >> >> >> >>> "Test" is an ambiguous word, means in my mind "test" (like beta-test). >>>> Word >>>> like "script" seems better. >>>> >>> Well, we use Test already quite a lot, as in Test Element / Test Script. >>> >>> Since JMeter is all about testing, I think using Test is OK. >>> >>> - HTTP(S) Proxy Recorder >>>> - HTTP(S) Proxy Test Recorder >>>> - Web Proxy Recorder >>>> - Web Proxy for Test Recorder >>>> - Web Proxy for Script Recorder >>>> - Web Proxy Script Recorder >>>> >>>> >>>> Web Proxy Recorder is my favorite. >>>> >>>> How about >>> >>> Web Test Script Recorder >>> >> >> +1 to this. >> >> >> >> or >>> Test Script Recorder - HTTP(S) >>> or >>> HTTP(S) Test Script Recorder >>> >>> Le 11/09/2013 09:00, Philippe Mouawad a ecrit : >>>> >>>> HTTP(S) Test Recorder would be a good name I think. >>>>> But if we do the change we absolutely need to keep all references to >>>>> JMeter >>>>> Proxy Server as it is referenced on many links and documentations. >>>>> >>>>> Did you have some time to think about summariser enabling ? >>>>> >>>>> Great changes you made sebb ! >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> On Tuesday, September 10, 2013, sebb wrote: >>>>> >>>>> The HTTP Proxy Server test element is used to record browser sessions >>>>>> as test plans. >>>>>> >>>>>> The name does not describe its function (it describes the >>>>>> implementation). >>>>>> Having Proxy in the name means it's more easily confused with the >>>>>> proxy settings that may be needed to run tests. >>>>>> >>>>>> I wonder if it would be a good idea to rename the test element to >>>>>> something like >>>>>> >>>>>> HTTP(S) Test Recorder >>>>>> or >>>>>> Test Recorder - HTTP(S) >>>>>> or >>>>>> Test Recorder - HTTP/HTTPS >>>>>> >>>>>> I did consider "Test Recorder" on its own, but that might be taken to >>>>>> imply that it can record other test types (e.g. JDBC), which it cannot >>>>>> at present. Even if we did implement JDBC recording, it would likely >>>>>> need a different GUI as the options would be completely different, so >>>>>> I think the name needs to include HTTP(S). >>>>>> >>>>>> I think the rename will only affect the component reference docs - and >>>>>> we can add an anchor for the old name. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thoughts? >>>>>> Would it help to rename the element? >>>>>> >>>>>> If there is agreement, I'd like to do this before the next release. >>>>>> There are other major changes to the recorder which also need >>>>>> documenting. >>>>>> >>>>>> >> > > > -- > Cordialement. > Philippe Mouawad.
